Biblical
Creationism
vs
Pantheistic Theories of
Evolution
(Nature Worship)
Written
and Compiled By:
Harry
A. Peyton
Table of Contents:
Introduction (5)
Genesis 1:1: God Creation of the Original Heavens and
Earth (16)
God Created the Original
Earth Out of Water (20)
Biblical and Scientific
Proves for a Young Earth and Reasons Why Animal and Plant Life Could Not Have
Existed More than 12,000 Years Ago (21)
Genesis 1:2: The Early History of the Original Earth and
Its Destruction (48)
Lucifer’s Rule over the
Original Earth (54)
How God Destroyed the
Original Earth at the End of Lucifer’s Reign (64)
The First Universal Flood of
the Bible
Scientific Evidence of Two
Universal Floods
Greek Mythology and Two
Universal Floods
Earth’s First Glaciation
Period Began After the Flood (75)
The Precambrian-Triassic Supercontinent of Rodinia?
The Original Earth Had a
Warm Climate and Abundance of Animal and Plant Life (77)
Genesis 1:3-19: God’s Restoration of the Earth (79)
Day 1: God Commanded the
Existing Lights of Heaven to Shine on the Waters Covering the Earth (79)
Day 2: God Commanded a
Three-Layer Atmosphere to Be Formed: the Middle Sphere or Mesosphere,
the Stratosphere, and the Thermosphere (82)
The Mesosphere Is Where God
Placed His Canopy of Transparent Solid Ice Crystal Clouds
Birds
Flew in the Water Vapor Atmosphere of the Stratosphere, Which Was Under the
Mesosphere
God
Placed the Sun, Moon, and Stars in Outer Space Above the Mesosphere
Atmospheric Terms Defined
In 2006 NASA Launches AIM’s
Satellite into Orbit to Ascertain Information About the Mysterious Glowing Ice
Crystal Clouds in the Mesosphere
Scientists Believe Ice
Crystal Clouds in the Mesosphere Today Maybe Causing Global Warming
Scientific Answers to the
Arguments of Some Evolutionists and Creationists against
God’s Atmospheric Canopy
Day 3: God Commanded Dry
Land to Appear, and Plant Life to be Restored on the Earth (99)
The Earth Had One Ocean
Composed of Surface Water Surrounding Its One Continent
and a Massive Amount of Subterranean Waters Under
Its Crust
The Earth Had Thousands of
Solid Rock Pillars Standing in Subterranean Waters Between the Crust and Upper
Mantle as Its Foundation
The Earth Was Watered by Fog
from Four Continental Long Rivers, A Multitude of Geysers, and the Ocean
God’s Solid Ice Crystal
Canopy in the Mesosphere and the 0° Tilt of the Earth on its
Axis,
Produced a Constant Warm Temperature Throughout the
Year on God’s Restored Earth
God’s Restored Earth Was A
Tropical Paradise
The Jurassic-Tertiary
Supercontinent of Pangaea?
Day 4: God Commanded the
Lights of Heaven to Shine on the Dry Surface of the Earth (112)
Hebrew Lexical Definitions of the Verbs Used
in Day 4
Hebrew Grammar Construction of the Verbs: the
Waw-Consecutive and the Plural Perfect Tense
Genesis 1:20-27: God Created Man and Restored Animal Life
on the Earth (116)
Day 5: God Commanded Sea
Creatures and Bird Life to be Restored on the Earth (116)
Day 6: God Commanded Human
Life to Come into Existence, and Land Animals to be Restored on the Earth (116)
God Commanded All Human
Beings, Animals, and Plants He Created to Reproduce after their Own Species,
Genus, Family, and Order
The Biblical and Scientific
Reasons for the Longevity of Man, before the Flood in Noah’s Day
The Second Universal Flood and the Glaciation Period that
Followed (123)
The Reasons Why God
Destroyed the World in Noah’s Day God’s Plan for Saving Men and Animals from
Destruction
The Biblical and Scientific
Evidence of Earth’s Second Universal Flood and How It Happen (133)
Scientific Evidence of a
Universal Flood
What Natural Events Did God
Used to Produce the Flood? (God’s Nuclear Weapons: an
Asteroid and Meteorites Crash into Pangaea’s Ocean)
What Caused the Solid Rock
Foundational Pillars of the Supercontinent Pangaea to Crumble?
Where Did All the
Floodwaters Come from to Cover the Entire Earth?
The Flood Waters Stopped on
the 150thDay
Where Did All the Water
Drain Off to from the Flood?
God in His Wisdom Caused
Very High Mountain to Be Built Around the Continents of the World,
So the Earth Could Never Be Flooded Again
Earth’s Second and Last
Glaciation Period Began After the Flood 101 Years after the Flood,
the Supercontinent Pangaea Split into Continents and
Began to Rapidly Drift Apart
The Worldwide Floor Theories
of Creational Scientists
The Historical Evidence of
the Biblical Universal Flood (161)
The Ancient Pantheistic Religious Origin of the
Modern-Day Theories of Evolution (168)
The Grecian, Hindu,
Egyptian, Babylonian, and Assyrian Belief in Evolution (173)
The Origin of Nature Worship
(183)
Definition of Scientific Terms (186)
Noted Creational, Evolutional and Ex-evolutional
Scientists Speak out against Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (189)
The Astronomical Probability
Against the Theory of Evolution (204)
Essays against Darwin’s
Theory of Evolution (207)
Creationism vs Evolutionism,
the Only Two Religious Theories of the Origin of Life (223)
Darwin’s
Pantheistic Religious Belief on the Origin of Man
The Serious Internal Problems of Darwin’s
Theory of Evolution
Darwin’s Belief on How Life on Earth Began
The Big Bang Religious Belief on the Origin of Man from Outer Space
Punctuated
equilibrium Evolution, the New Pantheistic Religious Theory, Which Replaced
Darwin’s Theory of Evolution
Scientific Arguments against Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (228)
Scientific Arguments against
Darwin’s Theory of
Spontaneous Generation
Scientific Arguments against
Darwin’s Uniformitarian Gradualism Theory of Evolution
The Scientific Evidence of the Geological Column
The 12 Strata Layers of the Geological Column Are
Never Found Together in Any One Place on Planet Earth
Missing and Out of Places Strata Layers in the
Geological Column
Out of Place Animal Fossils Found in the Geological
Column
How Is Strata Dated in the Geological Column
Scientific Proof the Earth Is Not Millions or
Billions Years Old (The Scientific Fact of Po Halos in
Precambrian Granites;
The Decrease of the Speed of Light through the
Centuries; The Conflicting Test Results Between Different
Methods of Radiometric Dating)
Darwin’s Theory of the Geological Column Was Laid Down Gradually vs
Flood
Catastrophism (Science
Reveals the Fossils Found in the Geological Column Had to be Place There by Being Buried Rapidly)
Scientific
Arguments against Darwin’s Theory of Natural Selection (228)
The
Indisputable Evidence of the Fossil Record Is against Darwin’s Religion of
Evolution
The Scientific Fact that a Multitude of Animal and
Plant Species Have Been Discovered in Fully Developed Form in the Cambrian
Geological Stratum, whose
Ancestry Could Not Be Found in the Layers of the Precambrian
in Fully Developed
Form in the Cambrian Geological Stratum, whose Ancestry Could Not Be Found in
the Layers of the Precambrian Developed Form in the Cambrian
Geological Stratum, whose Ancestry Could Not Be Found in the Layers of the
Precambrian
The
Scientific Fact that the Known Geological Column Has NO Missing Links of
Transitional Forms of Species
Scientific Arguments against
the Theory of Mutation of Darwin and Puntative equilibum Evolution (228)
The Scientific Arguments against the Theories of Stella
Evolution
The Steady State Theory
The Big Bang Theories:
(The Inflationary and the Oscillating Theories)
The Hidden Scientific, Moral, and Political Dangers of
Teaching Evolution in
Our
Colleges and Schools
The Polls Reveal that the
Vast Majority of Americans Are in Favor of Creationism
Being Taught in our Public Schools
Why the Lies of Evolution Are Being Promoted in Our World
Today?
The Rothschild’s
International Bankers Death Grip and Control of Our Government, Economy, Mass
News Medias,
and Educational System
Historical and Technical Research Papers
Historical Discoveries of
Out-of-Place Fossils in the Geological Column
Biography
Endnotes
A Message to My Readers: All quotes from technical
scientific research papers, especially those with physics and mathematical
formulas, will be given in brief summary or abstract form. Those who are
interested in reading these articles will find them at the end of this book in
the section entitled Technical Research Papers. All references to books or
articles will be giving in the endnotes section. Since all false beliefs in
science and theology are based on false assumptions, the author will use the
words: I assume or I believe to let my readers know that I am making an
assumption based on whatever evidence I am dealing with at that time.
Since Almighty God, the Lord Jesus Christ, gives His
Salvation and Word to all freely, this book is given without charge! Therefore,
feel free to copy it and share it with others. The
author forbids any alteration of this book, meaning changing any part of its
contents. This book must be given away and not sold. This book may be
placed on anyone’s web page, as long as my website address
(www.DoctrinesOfChrist.com) is attached to it. This book and all other books
written by Harry A. Peyton can be accessed through the Internet by going to the
above web address.
The author believes that the
Word of God is infallible in the original language it was written in, and
all translations of the Bible regardless of how good they may be are NOT. Since
the author has implicit faith in the infallibility of the Word of God, the
author has formed his beliefs on science firmly on the truth of the Bible. In
other words the author, who has endeavored to keep an unbiased mind, made a
comprehensive search for the truth of creation found in Genesis and other
passages of scripture, by examining the Hebrew Masoretic Text and the ancient Greek
Septuagint Version of the Old Testament, that is, WITHOUT regard to what creational and evolutional scientists
teach about it. After he was convinced that he found the truth, he than
examined creational and evolutional scientific literature to find evidence to
confirmed this truth!
This book uses the ancient
Antiochian Literal-Historical Method of interpreting the Bible, which was used
by early Christian Prophets of the Bible. I definitely believe that the ancient
Alexandrian Allegorical Method of spiritualizing scripture, which was made popular
by the ancient Jewish philosopher Philo Judaeus (13 BC – 50 AD) and later used
by the Ante-Nicene Catholic priests, especially Origen and his student Clement
of Alexandria (200 AD), is an abomination to our Lord. Therefore, the book of
Genesis and all other scriptures will be interpreted in a literal exegetical
fashion, unless the language used and the context demands a spiritual
interpretation.
All CAPITALIZATION and ITALICIZATION in QUOTES used in this book is always MINE. All
Biblical quotes used in this book will be in dark
red, and from the New King James version of the Bible, unless another
version is stated as the reference. The vast majority of all translations of
the Bible, as well as Hebrew and Greek Lexical definitions and grammar, will
come from BibleWorks
computer software program version 7.0.
May
this book be a real blessing to all Christians and Evolutionists in their
honest search for TRUTH. May the One and Only God (the
Lord Jesus Christ), the Creator of heaven and earth, send one of His holy
angels to all my readers to give them guidance and enlightenment is my prayer.
This book is still being written, so it is not finished.
Introduction
“And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you
free” (Jn 8:32).
Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is
like a ship that is sinking on today’s sea of science, as a result their are
many evolutional scientists who have abandoned their ship and have either
joined the Punctuate equilibrium Movement or the Intelligent Design Movement,
while others have joined the Creational Science Movement; there are still some
Darwinian scientists left today, who love their religion of Nature Worship and
are determined to go down with their ship, in spite of the scientific evidence
against it.
Darwinism is quickly becoming
ancient history, which is no longer relevant in the modern day informational
world we now live in. Darwinism has been proven to be nothing more than a
pseudoscience by evolutional scientists themselves, for the more research they
do to try to prove it, the more they come to realize that Darwinism is contrary
to true scientific evidence, and it is based on mere assumptions. This may
sound like an exaggerated statement to some, but after reading the evidence
presented in this book, mainly by evolutional scientists, my honest-hearted
readers will come to realize the undeniable truth of this statement.
I, Harry A. Peyton, am a
preacher of the great life-changing and life-fulfilling gospel of the Lord
Jesus Christ. I have a BA in Theology, and I have written twenty-five books,
including this one, on different Bible Doctrines, which I give away on my
website DoctrinesOfChrist.com. I give these books away because I do not believe
the infallible truths of the Word of God should be for sale. God inspired me to
write this book after I had several long telephone conversations with an
evolutionist by the name of Graham Kendall of Tulsa, OK.
I do not claim infallibility,
but I do believe that the major points in this book is true; there may be some
points or assumptions in science that I believe to be true but may not be, for
I do not claim to be a scientist. Since I am a man who loves truth and
diligently seeks after it, I am willing to change anything in this book that
may not be true, if anyone can prove me wrong by giving me either Biblical
evidence or real scientific evidence that is not based on theoretical
assumptions.
As I have stated in my other
books, I am not married to any doctrine or denomination, but to the Lord Jesus
Christ and His holy infallible Word, for He is not a truth but THE TRUTH (Jn 14:6). All good and honest men must
walk in the light of truth, as our Lord and Savior reveals it to them through
His Holy Spirit (Jn 14:17). Therefore, we all have a
responsibility to ourself, to our fellow man, and most of all to our GOD to “Walk” in “the light, lest darkness overtake” us (Jn 12:35).
Permit me also to say, the Word of God commands us
to: “Hate evil, love
good, and establish justice” (Amos 5:14-15, NAS). Therefore, it is the responsibility of every
Christian to hate what evil people do, but not the person who does it, for God
commands us to “love your enemies” and “do
good to all men” (Lk 6:32-35, Ga 6:10). Because the author loves holiness, righteousness,
and justice, he hate the willful lies some men of science have told against
their Creator and His creational works. In his love and zeal for truth, he has
made some strong statements against the lies these men have told. My readers
should bear in mind that these statements are not against any individual but
against the lie itself.
Since I believe experts in
science should speak for themselves, this book is filled with hundreds of
scientific statements made by Creational, Intelligent Design, and Evolutional
Scientists. The majority of the quotes will be from noted Evolutional and
Ex-evolutional Scientists, who agree with Creational Scientists on certain
points of science, such as the Fossil Record of the Geological Column, etc. I
will show from the words of evolutional professors that there are many lies
about evolution that have been written in textbooks, and taught in our public
schools and colleges today, and in times past. I will give as little comment as
possible in this book, and let the facts given by experts speak for itself.
I am asking my readers to read
and meditate on the evidence concerning Biblical Creationism vs Pantheistic
Evolutionism, and then judge for yourself concerning what is the truth! The
doctrines of Darwin’s Theory of Evolution and the Big Bang Theory of evolution,
along with its Oscillating Theory in which the universe undergoes a series of oscillations, each beginning with a big
bang and ending with a big crunch, are nothing but the continuation of the teaching
of ancient religions of pantheistic Nature Worship. I
will prove this truth in the chapter entitled “The Ancient Pantheistic
Religious Origin of the Modern-Day Theories of Evolution.”
God told us in His prophetic
Word the main lies the theories of evolution would teach, that is, it would
deny the fact that the One and Only God created the heavens and earth, and He
sent a universal flood to the earth TWICE. God speaking through the
apostle Peter, around 60 AD, declared that the scoffers, that is, the
evolutional agnostic and atheistic scientists and all other religious followers
of Pantheism would: “deliberately ignore this fact, that by the Word of God
heavens EXISTED long ago, and an earth formed out of water and by means of
water, through which the world that then existed was DELUGED [i.e.
flooded] with WATER and perished” (2Pe 3:5-6,
RSV).
Some scientists deliberately
ignore and keep silent concerning the truths of creation for fear of losing
their jobs, others openly lie because of fininacial and other rewards given to
them by their wealthy masters, while others have been thoroughly brainwashed by
their biased college professors against God’s truth of Creation, in which they
became converted to the pantheistic religion of evolution. Therefore, their
mind became so biased against the truths of Creation, and for evolution, that
they lost their objectivity, which resulted in some or much of
their scientific research becoming tainted in their efforts to prove their
religion and be recognized by their colleague in their profession.
I have written this book in
hopes that it will help some of God’s Children, especially the young and naive,
not to fall prey to the willful lies, which are now being told by evolutionists
of today; also in hopes that it may help the Children of God, who have been
deceived by these lies, to recover from their fallen state! I also sincerely
hope that it will help to convert sincere and honest nonbelieving evolutionists
to the TRUTH of God’s Word. This book will
definitely reveal that some evolutional scientists do tell lies in an effort to
defend their biased belief in Pantheistic Nature Worship. The following is some
of the evidence presented in this book by evolutionists themselves that reveals
this truth.
Evolutional Scientists Do Lie About Evolution: The noted evolutional
paleontologist Dr. Niles Eldredge, an adjunct professor at the City University
of New York and the Curator in the Department of Invertebrates at the American
Museum of Natural History, revealed that evolutional scientists do lie about
evolution. He openly confessed: It has
been the paleontologist – MY own breed – who have been most responsible for
letting ideas dominate reality.... We paleontologist have said that the history
of life supports that interpretation [i.e.
Darwinism], all the while KNOWING that IT
DOES NOT
(Time Frames: The Rethinking of
Darwinian Evolution, 1985, pg 144).
The late world renowned Dr.
Stephen Jay Gould, an evolutional professor of Geology, Biology, and the
History of Science at Harvard University and the curator for Invertebrate
Paleontology at the institution’s Museum of Comparative Zoology, made the same
confession as Eldredge when he declared: Paleontologists
have paid an exorbitant price for Darwin’s argument. We fancy ourselves as the
only true students of life’s history, yet to preserve OUR favored account of evolution
by Natural Selection, we view our data as SO BAD that we almost never
see the very process we profess to study (The
Panda’s Thumb, 1982, pp 181-182; also Evolution’s Erratic Pace,
vol 86, 5/1977, pp 12, 14).
Gould also confessed: We can tell TALES of improvement for some groups, but in honest
moments we must admit that the history of complex life is more a
story of multifarious variation about a SET of BASIC DESIGNS than a saga of accumulating
excellence [i.e. gradual evolution]…. I regard the FAILURE to find a clear ‘vector of progress’
in life’s history as the most puzzling fact of the fossil record….
We have sought to IMPOSE a pattern that we hoped to find in a world that
does NOT really display it (Natural
History, 2/82, pg 2).
When Professor Gould gave a
lecture at Hobart & William Smith College, he made the following
confession: Every paleontologist knows that most
SPECIES DON’T CHANGE. That’s bothersome... [it] brings terrible
distress…. They may get a little bigger or bumpier but they REMAIN the SAME
SPECIES and that’s NOT due to imperfection and gaps [i.e. in the fossil record] but STASIS. And yet this remarkable stasis has
generally been ignored as no data. If they DON’T change, its not
evolution so you don’t talk about it (Lecture
at Hobart & William Smith College, 2/1980).
What Dr. Gould means by species
becoming a little bigger or bumpier is: they may go through certain modifications
or adaptations, but they do not change into a different species, that
is, they remain the same species, genus, family, order, class, phylum, and
kingdom. In other words, evolutional scientists have never proved, and I might
add they will never prove, that dead lifeless rocks from the so-called Big Bang
can evolve into organic life of any kind, such as: fish can evolve into
reptiles, and reptiles can evolve into mammals, and monkeys or apes can evolve
into human beings! Since they cannot provide definite scientific evidence for
their religious belief system, they are living in a dream world and are
deceiving themselves and the general public with their lies. Drs. Gould and
Eldredge definitely revealed in the above quotes that evolution scientists have
LIED about what the fossil record really teaches.
Ex-Darwinian evolutional
Professor Colin Patterson of Oxford, a Paleontologist and the Curator at the
British Museum in London, also confessed that evolutionists do tell lies to
promote their belief system. Patterson writing against evolutional Punctuate
equilibrium scientists, such as Professors Gould and Eldredge, said: Well, it seems to me that they have accepted that the fossil
record DOESN’T give them the support they would value, so they searched around
to find another model [i.e. of
evolution], and found one…. When you HAVEN’T
got the EVIDENCE, you MAKE UP a STORY that will fit the LACK of EVIDENCE (Darwin's Enigma, L.D. Sunderland, pg 100).
In the Darwinian Centennial Year
Edition, that is the 1959 edition, of Darwin’s book entitled Origin of
Species, Dr. W.R. Thompson in the introduction of this edition candidly and
publicly confessed: Modern
Darwinian paleontologists are OBLIGED, just like their predecessors and like
Darwin, to WATER DOWN the facts with subsidiary hypotheses,
which, however plausible, are in the nature of things UNVERIFIABLE…. There is a
great divergence of opinion among biologists, NOT ONLY about the causes
of evolution but even about the actual process. This divergence
exists because the EVIDENCE is UNSATISFACTORY and does NOT permit any certain
conclusion.
It is therefore right and proper to draw the attention of
the non-scientific public to the disagreements about evolution. But some recent
remarks of evolutionists show that they think this unreasonable. This
situation, where men rally to the defense of a doctrine they are
UNABLE to DEFEND SCIENTIFICALLY, much less demonstrate with scientific rigor,
attempting to maintain its credit with the public by the SUPPRESSION of
criticism and the elimination of difficulties, is abnormal and undesirable
in science
(Everyman’s Library Series,
reprinted in Journal of the American Affiliation, 3/1960).
Evolutional Professor
Pierre-Paul Grasse, who taught zoology and anatomy at several French
universities, including the Université de Paris, confessed: Today our duty is to destroy the MYTH of [Darwinian] evolution,
considered as a simple, understood and explained phenomenon which keeps rapidly
unfolding before us. Biologists must be encouraged to think about the weaknesses
and EXTRAPOLATIONS that the theoreticians put forward or lay down as
established truths. The DECEIT is sometimes unconscious, but NOT always, since
some people, owing to their sectarianism [i.e. their
sect], PURPOSELY overlook reality and
refuse to acknowledge the inadequacies and FALSITY of their BELIEFS [pg 8]…. The
almost total ABSENCE of fossil evidence relative to the origin of
the phyla… leads to the formulation of pure conjecture as to the genesis
of the phyla (pg 31, The Evolution of Living
Organisms, 1977).
The Fresno Bee newspaper
spoke of the lies that evolutionists tell this way: Scientists who go about teaching that evolution is a fact of
life are GREAT CON MEN, and the story they are telling may be the GREATEST HOAX
ever. In explaining evolution we do NOT have one iota of fact.’ Dr. T. N.
Tahmisian, a physiologist for the Atomic Energy Commission, called it a tangled
mishmash of guessing games and figure juggling (8/20/1959, pg 1-B).
Evolutionist Dr. Percy E. Raymond, Professor of
Paleontology at Harvard University, speaking of the origin of life confessed: It is
evidence that the oldest Cambrian fauna is diversified and NOT so
simple, perhaps, as the evolutionists would hope to find it. Instead of
being composed chiefly of protozoans, it contains NO representatives of that
phylum but NUMEROUS members of seven HIGHER groups are present, a fact which
shows that the greater part of the major differentiation of animals had
already taken place in those ancient times (Prehistoric Life, 1967, pg
23).
Noted evolutional Professor
George Gaylord Simpson, in his book Tempo and Mode in Evolution,
confessed there is NO
EVIDENCE
in the fossil record to prove that animals and plants ever evolved. Dr.
Simpson declared: The geologic
record did NOT then [meaning in
Darwin’s day] and still does NOT
yield a finely graduated chain of slow and progressive evolution [pg 23]…. This
is true of all the thirty-two ORDERS of MAMMALS…. The earliest and
most primitive known members of every order already have the basic
ordinal characters, and in NO case is an approximately continuous sequence
from one order to another known. In most cases the break is so sharp and the
gap so large that the ORIGIN of the ORDER is SPECULATIVE and MUCH DISPUTED [pg 105]….
This regular absence of transitional forms is
NOT confined to mammals, but is an almost universal phenomenon, as has long
been noted by paleontologists. It is true of almost all orders of all
classes of animals, both vertebrate and invertebrate…. It is also
true of the classes themselves, and of the major animal phyla, and it is
apparently also true of analogous categories of plants (Tempo and Mode in Evolution, 1944, G. G. Simpson, pg
107).
Dr. Simpson was the Professor of Zoology at Columbia University, and curator of
the Department of Geology and Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural
History from 1945 to 1959. He was also a Professor of Zoology at Harvard
University, and curator of the Museum of Comparative Zoology from 1959 to 1970
I might also add, the geological
column and the modern radiometric dating system of these layers have been
proven to be nothing but a sham, that is, nothing but evolutional garbage that
is used to promote their religious sect. The evidence of Skull 1470 is just one
example of the scientific fraud used in dating fossils. Skull 1470 has caused
evolutionists so much embarrassment that it has been kept out of the world’s
major news networks.
This skull had a brain capacity
of 750cc, and it could be classified as a small teenage girl or woman. The
volcanic ash this African skull and several Australopithecus fossils were found
in was originally dated about 3 million years old by the noted African
paleontologist Richard Leakey. Before Skull 1470 was unearthed, the
Australopithecus species was believed to be the oldest ancestor of man. Before
this problematic skull was found, no evolutional scientist disputed the 3.5
million year age of any of the Australopithecus fossils or the volcanic ash
strata they were found in.
The truly amazing secret of
evolutionists is that 31 DATES were given to volcanic ash that
Skull 1470 was found in, which ranged from 2.25-230 MILLION YEARS OLD. These dates were given by various science labs,
which used different methods of radiometric dating. For example, Leakey gave
samples of the volcanic ash to the prestigious Cambridge University lab in
England for testing, which gave it a potassium-argon date test. This test gave
an age of 212-230 MILLION
YEARS OLD
(Nature, 2/1973, pp 226-8,
Fitch & Miller)!
This was much too old for Leakey
pantheistic belief system to handle, so he chose to give National Geographic
in an interview a date of about 3 million year for Skull 1470. The only real
problem he encountered was: this date was much too high for the supposedly
infallible evolutional charts invented by his fellow evolutionists; as a
result, the evolutional scientific community rejected this date. So after 10
years of hot debate on the age of Skull 1470 by evolutional
scientists, it was decided by their hierarchical high priesthood that the
geological layer of volcanic ash could not have been older than 1.9 million
years old, with no more scientific justification than a pig’s tooth was allegedly
found in this layer! In other words, when radiometric dating disagreed with the
religious belief system of evolutional scientists, they simply stick their
heads in the sand and ignore it. Later we will examine in detail this great
find.
Now the real question the
inquisitive mind should ask is: if radiometric dating is absolute proof of the
age of something, than why didn’t the different radiometric dating systems AGREE on their dates for the volcanic ash that Skull 1470
was found in? Also, if evolutional scientists truly and totally believe that
the radiometric dating is perfect, than why did they not consider the dates
given by various scientific dating labs as correct, that is, why did they
reject the evidence of these labs to hold on to the dates given in their
evolutional charts?
Why not change the dates on
their charts to teach man’s ancestry go back to 230 million years? The answer
is simple: they know that they would have to redo their entire history of
evolution, for they would be at a lost to explain what animal man theoretically
evolved from. They also know that the American people, and the people of the
world, would know they have lied about their religion of Nature Worship! Oh
what tangle web of evil lies one is entangled and entrapped in, when one
intentionally sets out to tell a lie!
Why the Lies of Evolution Are Believed in Our
World Today: Intelligent people, who have read the above statements, will no doubt
ask: if your claims are true, then why do college and public school textbooks,
noted newspapers, science magazines, radio and TV news networks, as well as
evolutional professors in universities claim that evolution is essentially a
proven fact and all scientists of today believe it? The reason for this willful
deception, which has been perpetrated on intelligent men and women in America
and the world is: “The love of money is a root of all kinds of evil”
(1Ti 6:10).
At the end of this book, I will
give evidence that will reveal that the Luciferian International Bankers,
through their Tax-Exempt Foundations, control what is being taught on evolution
and other subjects in the major universities of America today. They use their
Foundations, like Rothschild’s Rockefeller Foundation, to give millions of
dollars in grants to the MAJOR universities in our country.
The real problem is these money grants are not given without conditions.
Some of these conditions are: 1)
The university must hire the professors they recommend for certain courses. 2)
They must use the textbooks they recommend. 3) They must promote
internationalism and etc. Since most Americans, and the people of the world,
might find the above statement hard to believe, permit me to briefly give a
little evidence at this time to confirm the above truths; I will give the rest
of the evidence at the end of this book.
Deceased Congressman
Lawrence P. Mc Donald in November 1975, in the “Introduction” to Gary Allen’s book The Rockefeller
File, publically proclaimed for all to read: The super
rich in America enjoy power and prerogatives un-imaginable to most of us…. And
to my knowledge, not one has dared reveal the most vital part of the Rockefeller
story: that the Rockefellers and their allies have, for at least
fifty years, been carefully following a plan to use their economic power to
gain political control of first America, and then the rest of the world. Do I
mean conspiracy? Yes, I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international
in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.
The late prestigious and very noted professor of
history, government, and economics, Dr. Carroll Quigley of the universities of
Princeton (1935--37), Harvard (1938-41), and Georgetown – School of Foreign
Service (1941-47), wrote a massive 1,350 page history entitled Tragedy And
Hope: A History of the World in Our Time. In it he has a great deal to say
about the International Bankers’ conspiracy for World Government, which is
headed by the Rothschilds.
Professor Quigley
candidly confessed: There does exist, and has existed for a
generation, an international Anglophile network which operates, to some extent,
in the way the radical Right believes the Communists act…. I know of the
operations of this network because I have studied it for twenty years and was
permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to examine its papers and secret
records. I have no aversion to it or to most of its aims and have, for much of
my life, been close to it and to many of its instruments…. I believe its role
in history is significant enough to be known (pg 950).
Dr. Quigley also
gave us the main goal of these Luciferians Bankers when he declared: The world
is in the throes, which precede creation or death. Our whole race has outgrown
the merely national state and, as surely as day follows night or night the day,
will pass either to a Commonwealth of Nations or else to an empire
of slaves (pg 147). The truth is, if world government comes, our
children, our grandchildren, you and I will become slaves in their New World
Order.
Professor Quigley
speaking of the great power of these International Bankers wrote: They were
cosmopolitan and international; they were close to governments and were
particularly concerned with government debts, including foreign
government debts; these bankers came to be called ‘international bankers….
The money power controlled by the international investment bankers, were
able to DOMINATE both business and GOVERNMENTS….
It must not be felt that these heads of
the world’s chief central banks [including Federal Reserve Banks] were
themselves substantive powers in world finance. They were NOT.
Rather, they were the technicians and agents of the dominant
investment bankers of their own countries, who had raised them up and were
perfectly capable of throwing them down.
The substantive financial powers of the world were in
the hands of these investment bankers (also called ‘international’ or
‘merchant’ bankers) who remained largely behind the scenes in their own
unincorporated private banks. These formed a system of international
cooperation and national dominance, which was more private, more
powerful, and more secret than that of their agents in the central banks” [pp 326-327].
These Luciferian Bankers own the
National Debt of every nation, including America’s debt, which on April 7, 2009 was $11,152,772,833,835.89, that is, we owe these demon possessed men OVER
ELEVEN TRILLION DOLLAR [http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin/?application=np]. Money buys the allegiance of
officials in federal and state governments, in the MOST RENOWNED
UNIVERSITIES of America, along with its professors! Money also buys the allegiance
of the MOST IMPORTANT NEWS MEDIAS such as: the API Press, the New
York Times, the Wall Street Journal, and the major TV News Networks!!
These Bankers, with their
satanic wisdom, know that all they need to do to brain-wash the American public
and the world, to believe what they want them to believe, is to control the MAJOR UNIVERSITIES and NEWS
SOURCES
in America and the world; for they know that professors of smaller universities
and teachers in public schools will use the textbooks of the MOST RENOWNED PROFESSORS, and the smaller news medias
will use the stories of the CELEBRATED
NEWS MEDIAS, which have very large news staffs.
Dr. Quigley
speaking of the Reece Committee’s investigation of the Tax-Exempt Foundations
wrote: The eighty-third Congress in July 1953 set up a Special
Committee to Investigate Tax-Exempt Foundations with Representative B. Carroll
Reece, of Tennessee, as chairman. It soon became clear that people [i.e. the
Luciferian International Bankers] of immense wealth would be
unhappy if the investigation went too far, and that the ‘most
respected’ NEWSPAPERS in the country, CLOSELY ALLIED with these men of
wealth, would NOT get excited enough about any revelations to make the
publicity worth while…. An interesting report showing the Left-wing
associations of the INTERLOCKING NEXUS of tax-exempt foundations was
issued in 1954 rather quietly (pg 955).
In other words
these Luciferian Bankers controlled the major news medias of the United States.
Our congress has known about these and other un-American and
subversive activities of these bankers long before 1953. Congress ordered this
investigation to be made of the Tax-Exempt Foundations for the purpose of
discover which: foundations and
organizations are using their resources for purposes other than the purposes for
which they were established, and especially to determine which such foundations
and organizations are using their resources for un-American and subversive
activities.
The report that
was given to congress by the Reece committee was entitled Tax-Exempt
Foundations and
Comparable Organizations. It stated: It is the
conclusion of this committee that the subject of FOUNDATIONS urgently
requires the CONTINUED attention of Congress…. [They are]
contributing funds to a Communist or Communist-front organization, or for
Communist purposes…. It [i.e. a foundation] can exercise various forms of
patronage, which carry with them elements of THOUGHT CONTROL. It can
exert IMMENSE INFLUENCE on EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS, upon EDUCATIONAL
PROCESSES, and upon EDUCATORS….
It can
materially predetermine the development of social and political concepts
and courses of action, through the process of granting or withholding
foundation awards [i.e. grant money] upon a selective basis, and by
designing projects, which propel research in selected directions.
It can play a powerful part in the determination of ACADEMIC
OPINION, and through this THOUGHT leadership, materially influence
public opinion…. There is such a concentration foundation power in
the United States, operating in the social SCIENCES and EDUCATION….
Their
[i.e. the International Bankers’] ARROGANCE in dealing with this committee, the
major foundations and their associated intermediary organizations
have entrenched themselves behind a totality of power which presumes to
place them beyond criticism…. It operates in part through certain intermediary
organizations supported by the foundations. It has ramifications
in almost every phase of RESEARCH and EDUCATION, in COMMUNICATIONS, and even in
government….
Research
in the social SCIENCES plays a key part in the evolution of our society. Such
research is now almost wholly in the control of the professional
employees of the large foundations and their obedient satellites.
Even the great sums allotted by the Federal Government for social SCIENCE
research have come into the virtual control of this professional
group, [who have]… shown a distinct tendency to
favor political opinions of the LEFT…. We have seen many COMMUNISTS
and fellow-travelers recommended by foundation executives
for government posts…. ‘I was shocked when I saw the list . . . I wanted to
find out where the list came from, and I was told it had come from the
Institute of Pacific Relations’ (Hearings p. 561) (http://www.garynorth.com/products/item9.cfm;
also see American Mercury, July
1954, pp 56-64).
The financial control of
these Luciferian Bankers over colleges can be seen in the lives of ex-evolution
college professors, who saw their error and began to promote Intelligent Design
in Creation in their classes. Some of these men have written textbooks on
evolution, and have taught evolution for years, yet their university discharge
them, and in some cases tried to have them fired, so they could be
replaced with a confirm evolutionist. These men and their struggles with their
university will be discussed later in this book.
Professor
Quigley speaking of the purpose of these Tax-Exempt Foundations declared: The
organization of tax-exempt fortunes of international financiers into
foundations was to be used for EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC, ‘and other public
purposes….’ As a well-organized plot, by extreme LEFT-wing
elements operating from the White House itself and CONTROLLING all the CHIEF
AVENUES of PUBLICITY in the United States, to DESTROY the AMERICAN WAY OF LIFE,
based on private enterprise, laissez faire, and isolationism, in behalf of
alien ideologies of Russian Socialism and British cosmopolitanism
(i.e. world empire) (pg 950).
In Congressional
Digest we can read James P. Warburg’s speech, which he made on June 29,
1948, in which he promoted world government. Warburg declared: What about
the power to enact, or fail to enact, a Bill of Rights? Should the World
Government be given the power to insist upon worldwide protection of the
individual against the stated? Should there be a worldwide habeas corpus, trial
by jury, freedom of worship, freedom of thought, speech and press and the right
of free assembly…? To insist upon the immediate inclusion of the power
to enforce a worldwide Bill of Rights would, to my mind DESTROY all hope of
arriving at a worldwide agreement
(Congressional Digest, vol 27, # 8-9, August-September 1948,
pg 218).
This same Luciferian came to the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee, on February 17, 1950, and had the audacity to tell them: We shall
have world government whether or not you like it - by CONQUEST or consent (The Rockefeller File, Gary
Allen, pg 77). James Warburg was
the son of the villainous and traitorous Federal Reserve conspirator Paul
Warburg, who was the mastermind behind the Federal Reserve Act, which is the
greatest curse ever forced upon the American people.
The Luciferian
used their treasonous Federal Reserve Banks to gain control of our currency,
which no longer belongs to us but to them. In other words, the Federal Reserve
Banks, like all Central Banks in Europe, are PRIVATE BANKS and not government
own banks, as any good encyclopedia will inform you. As a result, the currency
of our great nation belongs to them; this is why it is called a Federal Reserve
Note! The outrageous interest these Luciferian charge governments through these
banks is why every government in the world is deeply indebted to them and have
become their obedient slaves.
When one fully understands the
great financial power of these foundations, and their true purpose, it is not
hard to understand why the truth is being suppressed and the lie of
pantheistic evolution is promoted in the world today; for these bankers
hate the Lord Jesus Christ and Christianity, and are Luciferians in their religious
belief system. Their goal is to bring in a One-World Government, a One-World
Economic System, and a One-World Luciferian Religion, or as they term it “the
pure worship of Lucifer.” Therefore, they want total control over governments,
natural resources, the economy of nations, and the religions of the world. They
want a total monopoly on all trade, which means they hate the free-trade
system.
The Word of God and Science: The Bible is greatest source of truth the world has
ever know. It is not a textbook on science, but every scientific statement it
makes dealing with the creation of the earth, heaven, man, animals, and plants
can be verified by true science. It is not a Psychology textbook, but every
statement it make dealing with mental health and how to have peace of mind and
heart, even in the midst of tragedy in one’s life, has been proven in Christian
experiences throughout the ages.
I can definitely avowal to this great
truth in my life, for my sweet Lord has been with me and has given me peace of
mind and inward joy through all my heartaches and the rivers of tears I have
shed. Therefore, I firmly believe that God’s Word, that is, in the original
language it was written in is truly infallible in every field of science and
life. With these great truths in mind, let us now examine the truths of
Biblical Science.
Genesis
1:1: God Creation of the Original Heavens and Earth
There are two basic Christian
beliefs on Creation: First Belief is that God
created the heavens and earth at the beginning of time. The heavens God created
did not have any objects of lights in them, that is, there was no sun, moon,
stars, etc, just empty space. The earth at that time did NOT have any shape and
life forms on it (Genesis 1:1-2). According to this belief, God
was in the process or act of creating all things for the first time (vss 3-27).
Second Belief: At the beginning of time the
ONE and ONLY God, that is, YHWH - the Lord Jesus Christ, the Creator created
the earth and the heavens, which included the sun, moon, stars, and etc (vs 1). The earth was created perfectly without any flaw
and was circular in shape; both the heavens and earth were completely furnished
and finished at the time of creation. I definitely believe that creation
probably took place about 12,000 YEARS AGO, but not more than 18,000 YEARS AGO.
I will provide the scientific evidence for this belief later.
In verse 2, God destroyed the
earth through earth’s FIRST of TWO UNIVERSAL FLOODS. This put the earth in an
uninhabitable condition, that is, the earth became a wasteland and empty of all
life, for most or all plant and animal life was destroyed. God did NOT destroy
the solar system, but only the earth with its atmospheric heavens. God
destroyed these things because the archangel Lucifer, whom He gave the
authority to rule over earth and one third of Hs angels, rebelled against Him
at that time.
Around 6,000 YEARS AGO, in
verses 3-25, God was in the act of restoring the atmospheric heavens and the
earth to its former habitable condition, as well as plant and animal life. In
verses 26-27, God created mankind (Adam), which was the beginning of man
existence. This is my belief, and when we examine Hebrew grammar, word
meaning, context, and comparing scripture with other scriptures, I believe this
great truth will shine its light upon our heart and open our understanding.
Genesis Verse One: One thing Christians have over
evolutionists, we are honest enough to admit that our belief of creation by the
Lord Jesus Christ is a religious belief, even though it is supported by
scientific evidence such as the fossil record, etc. Christians openly confess
we believe: “In the
BEGINNING God CREATED [bara’] the
heavens and the earth” (Gen 1:1).
Hebrew Grammar
Construction: Bara’ is qal, perfect tense, 3rd person, and singular
number. Qal is: the most frequently used verb pattern; it expresses the
‘simple’ or ‘casual’ action of the root in the ACTIVE VOICE, which means, in
this verse the subject (God) is the one who is doing the action or work. Perfect
tense in the Hebrew means completed action in the PAST, that is, God completed
or finished the work of creation of heaven and earth at a definite point in
time known only as the beginning.
According to Jeff A. Benner at
the Ancient Hebrew Research Center: There are
four tenses in Hebrew verbs, perfect, imperfect, participle, and imperative. In
the English language the verb tenses are related to time: past, present and
future, while the Hebrew verbs are all related to action. The perfect tense
is a COMPLETED ACTION and in most cases is related to the English past
tense (he cut). The imperfect tense is an INCOMPLET ACTION and is closely
related to the English present and future tenses (he cuts or
he will cut) (http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/26_verbs.html).
According to Gesenius' Hebrew Grammar, by
Wilhelm Gesenius a very noted theologian of the 19th century, the
IMPERFECT TENSE in Hebrew is defined as: actions, events, or states
which are regarded by the speaker at any moment as STILL CONTINUING, or in process
of accomplishment, or even as just taking place (Use of the Imperfect, #107a, edited by Professor E. Kautzsch; in
BibleWorks V 7.0). Gesenius defines the PERFECT TENSE as: A (a)
actions, events, or states, which the speaker wishes to represent from the
point of view of COMPLETION, whether they belong to a determinate PAST
TIME, or extend into the present, or while still FUTURE, are
pictured as in their COMPLETED state. The definition formerly given here (‘the
perfect serves to express COMPLETED actions’) (The Parts
of Speech, I. Syntax of the Verb A, 106, Use of the Perfect).
The FUTURE TENSE can be
represented by the imperfect and perfect tenses, especially when the verb is
attached to a Waw
Consecutive. Gesenius defines
The Imperfect with WaÒw Consecutive as: W (3) To represent FUTURE actions in dependence on —
(a) an imperfect which refers to the FUTURE, Ps 49:15… a perfect
consecutive, or those perfects which… are intended to represent FUTURE events
as undoubtedly certain, and therefore as though already accomplished (perf.
propheticum); cf. Is 5:15…. A FUTURE participle, Jer 4:16 (#111a and
c1.2).
Hebrew Lexical
Definition: The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT) by Doctors R. Laird Harris, Gleason L.
Archer Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke defined the Hebrew verb “bara’” or “created” as: The root bara’ has the basic meaning ‘to CREATE.’ It differs
from yasar ‘to fashion’ in that the latter primarily emphasizes the shaping of
an object while bara’ emphasizes the initiation of the object…. The word
also possesses the meaning of ‘BRINGING INTO EXISTENCE’ in several passages
(Isa 43:1; Ezek 21:30 (H 35); Ezek 28:13, 15). It is not surprising that this
word with its distinctive emphases is used most frequently to describe the creation
of the universe and the natural phenomena (Gen 1:1, 21, 27; Gen 2:3 etc) (#278a; BibleWorks V 7.0).
The apostle Paul confirmed this
definition of the verb “bara’ (created)” when he wrote: “By faith we understand that the
worlds were framed by the WORD of God, so that the things which are seen
were NOT MADE of things which are visible” (Heb 11:3). The prophet David stated the
same truth when he inspirationally proclaimed: “By the WORD of the LORD
the heavens were MADE, and all the host of them by the BREATH of His MOUTH” (Psa 33:6). Therefore the Bible emphatically declares without
dispute that God CREATED the heavens and earth out of NOTHING, that is, by the
Almighty power of His SPOKEN WORD.
God created the
Original Earth and Heavens at the Beginning of Time in One Day’s Time: “These are the HISTORIES [towledah –
plural number] of the heavens and the earth, when
they were created [bara'], in the DAY [yowm
– singular number] that Jehovah Elohim made earth
and heavens” (Gen 2:4, Darby, also see KJV, ASV, JPS, RSV). We will examine this verse in
detail in verse 2 of Genesis one, but for now it will suffice to say the
original creation took place on a certain day (singular number) in time, and not on certain days plural number.
God Created the Earth and Stretched Out the Heavens at a
Definite Point of Time in the Past, which Proves the Big Bang Theory is False: The Bible emphatically declares
that YHWH (the Lord Jesus Christ) created the heaven and earth without the help
of any other being or evolutional processes, such as the Big Bang. It proclaims
that God created: “all things; that stretched forth [natah a
verbal participle – having expanded] the heavens ALONE; that spread abroad the earth by MYSELF” (Isa 44:24, Jewish Publication Society translation;
all of the following scriptures are also verbal participle: Psa 104:2; Job 9:8; Isa 40:22; 42:5).
Hebrew Lexical Definition: The TWOT defined the Hebrew verb ‘natah’ as: extend, stretch out, spread out… the Creator, whose hands ‘stretched out’ the heavens as a tent (#352).
Hebrew Grammar Construction: Dr.
Bernard Northrup, a Hebrew scholar, speaking of the above and following
passages of scripture declared: In Hebrew… it is always the context
of a verb or participle that determines the time setting in which it
must be translated. I have noted the participles and the identified perfect
tense verbs used in these sentences, speak of God's having stretched out
the heavens in the PAST…. I do NOT find any excuse whatsoever in the context of
any of the uses of the participle phrase noteh shamayim, ‘stretching out the heavens’, or any of the perfect
verbs for translating them without acknowledging their PAST TIME context.
Again I say that I see NO justification for attempting to support the concept
of the continuing spreading out of the heavenly bodies today,
that is, the Big Bang Theory (Continental Drift and the Fossil Record, 1979, Bible Science
Association).
Dr. Northrup
translated Isaiah 51:13 as: I am “the
One having stretched out [verbal participle] heavens and having laid [verbal participle] the foundation of the earth”; and Zechariah 12:1: “The Eternal Lord, the One having stretched out [verbal
participle] heavens and having laid [verbal
participle] the foundations of earth.”
It is interesting
to note that in the above scriptures, the similarities God makes between
the verbs He uses in describing the laying of the foundations of earth
and the stretching out of heaven, in which both according to their verbs
happened in PAST. The clear inference between comparing the two is: the one and only God
definitely FINISHED the work of creating the earth and the stretching out or
expanding the heavens at a definite time in the past; no doubt it was in
Genesis 1:1, that is, on the DAY of creation when He completed
this work.
The Word of God and Big Bang
do agree on one point, that is, the universe expanded, but they disagree on how
long the expansion lasted. The Bible clearly declares it was in the past and
stopped at the Creation event, while evolutionists imagine that the Big Bang’s
expansion of the universe is still continuing today. The following scriptures that
speak of God stretching out the heaven are in the PERFECT tense, that is, it is
COMPLETED ACTION of the PAST:
Isaiah 45:12: “It
is I who made [perfect tense] the earth
and created mankind upon it. My own hands STRETCHED OUT [natah – perfect
tense] the heavens; I marshaled their starry
hosts” (NIV); Jeremiah 10:12: “He has made
the earth by His power, He has established the world by His wisdom, and has
STRETCHED OUT [natah – perfect tense] the heavens
at His discretion”; and Jeremiah 51:15: “He has made the earth by His
power; He has established the world by His wisdom, and STRETCHED OUT [natah
– perfect tense] the heaven by His
understanding.” As I stated above, the perfect tense is a COMPLETED ACTION in the
PAST; therefore the stretching out, spreading out, or expanding of the heavens
has already taken place in the past, it cannot be taking place today!
The English Translation of The Septuagint Version of the Old Testament
by Sir Lancelot C. L. Brenton, translated the above Jeremiah passage this way: “The Lord made the earth by His
power, preparing the world by His wisdom, by His understanding He STRETCHED OUT
[ekteino] the heaven.” Greek Lexical
Definition: Louw-Nida Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament defined the Greek verb “ekteino”
as: to
cause an object to extend in space (for example, by becoming straight,
unfolded, or uncoiled) – ‘to stretch out, to extend, to reach out’ (#16.19).
Greek Grammar Construction: This verb is in the “aorist tense, indicative mood, and
active voice”. Dr. Daniel Wallace in his Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics - An
Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament defined the “aorist tense” as a: Snapshot’
The aorist tense ‘presents an occurrence in summary, viewed as a whole from the
outside, without regard for the internal make-up of the occurrence. This contrasts
with the present and imperfect, which portray the action as an ongoing
process…. 2. Time: In the indicative, the aorist usually
indicates PAST TIME with reference to the time of speaking (thus, ‘absolute
time’). Aorist PARTICIPLES usually suggest antecedent time
to that of the main verb (i.e. PAST TIME in a relative sense) (The Aorist Tense, Aspect and Time, A. 1-2; pg 555).
In Isaiah 48:13 the Hebrew verb
“taphach” is used which has a similar meaning to the verb “natah”. God says: “Indeed My hand has laid the foundation
of the earth, And My right hand has STRETCHED OUT [taphach –
perfect tense] the heavens; when I call
to them, They stand up together.” Hebrew Lexical
Definition: The TWOT defined “taphach” as: The basic
meaning is ‘to stretch, expand, or draw out a surface.’ Taphach stresses ‘space,’ while natah emphasizes the stretching ‘action’ and ‘direction’ (#818).
God
Created the Original Earth Out of Water
According to evolutional scientists, the earth has
had three MAJOR GLACIATIONS, and the first occurred during the late
PROTEROZOIC ERA (allegedly around 770-570 mya probably just before
12,000-18,000 years ago). In this
book, the phrase million of years ago will always be abbreviated as mya.
I believe this supposed glaciation was probably the water God
created or spoke into existence to make the earth.
There is a vast difference in time between a glacier
period and an ice age. An ice age is a long period of cold temperature in which
ice sheets cover a very large part of the Earth, while a glacial period refer
to a short colder phase whereby glaciers are formed and then are followed by
warmer interglacial periods.
According to some scientists the waters found in the
above era were not in a glacial form: The debris layer
that is found on all continents a little below the boundary between the
Proterozoic and the Cambrian [770-570 mya]. This debris layer is composed of pebbles,
cobbles and boulders bound together in a cement-like matrix. It is called a
conglomerate, or diamictite, or tillite. However, the latter term implies a
glacial origin. For this reason, one of the current explanations for
this worldwide debris layer invokes a ‘snowball earth’ scenario.
This scenario postulates or assumes that the whole planet is iced over,
including the oceans, with glaciers existing at sea level in the tropics. However, Williams and Schmidt list off 10 solid geological
reasons why this scenario must be INVALID and a different explanation
must be sought (30) (http://www.setterfield.org/000docs/earlyhist.html, article:
Early History, sec. The Flood Layer in Geology, by Barry
Setterfield, reference 30: G. Williams and P. Schmidt, “Proterozoic
Equatorial Glaciation?" The Australian Geologist, No. 117, 31
December 2000).
The Word of God does not speak of these evolutional
imaginary glaciates, but it definitely declares that the earth was formed by
Creational Waters. The Bible says it this way: “But they [i.e. the
evolutional atheists and agnostics] deliberately
forget that long ago by God’s Word the heavens existed and the earth was
FORMED [sunistao] out of WATER and by
WATER” (2Pe 3:5, NIV). The New American Standard
Version of the Bible translated this verse this way: “For when they maintain this, it escapes their
notice that by the Word of God the heavens existed long ago and the
earth was FORMED [sunistao] out of
WATER and by WATER” (NAS).
The Greek verbal participle “sunistao” is in the perfect tense and
active voice, which means God COMPLETED the creation of the earth out of and
by water in the PAST! Doctors J. P. Louw
and E. A. Nida in their Louw-Nida Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament
defined “sunistao” as: (perfect active): to COME
into EXISTENCE, with the implication of acquiring form and substance – ‘to
come into existence, to be FORMED….’ ‘By the Word of God the earth was FORMED out
of WATER and by WATER’ 2 Pe 3.5 (#13.82).
Greek Lexical Definition: In A Greek-English Lexicon
of the New Testament by professor Joseph Henry Thayer of Harvard, “sunistao” is defined as: to PUT TOGETHER (i. e. unite parts into one whole), perfect,
pluperfect and 2 aorist… evx u[datoj
kai, diV u[datoj, 2 Pet. 3:5 (cf. Winer's
Grammar, sec. 45, 6 a) (#5101, sec
4).
Therefore, according to the infallible Word of God, the Creator the Lord Jesus
Christ spoke water into existence and then made the earth and probably heaven
out of it at a definite point of time in the PAST, in which Genesis 1:1 calls
the BEGINNING.
Conclusion: According to all the above passages of scripture and
the verbs used in them, God created the original earth and expanded the heavens
out of water in the past on a certain day in time called the beginning.
Since the heavens are NO LONGER EXPANDING, we must conclude that the universe
is STATIC, which means the Big Bang belief of evolutionists is a FALSE THEORY.
Scientific proof of the universe being in a static condition, and not an
expanding condition, will be given in the chapter entitled “The
Scientific Problems With the Theories of Stella Evolution”.
Biblical
and Scientific Proves for a Young Earth and Reasons Why Animal and Plant Life
Could Not Have Existed More than 12,000 Years Ago
Biblical
Reason
God’s Predestine Plan of Redemption: I confess that I do NOT know
how old the earth is. There is nothing in the Bible that I can find that tells
me. The Word of God simple states that God created the original heavens and
earth at the beginning of time on a certain day, whenever that was! As I stated
above, I personally do NOT believe that it was more than
12,000 years ago, for any student of the Bible knows that God had Calvary in
mind BEFORE He created heaven and earth.
The infallible Word of God
definitely teaches that God had man’s redemption in mind before He created the
universe. The Bible says it this way: “All who dwell on the earth will worship him [i.e.
the Antichrist], whose names have not been
written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain FROM the
FOUNDATION of the world” (Rev 13:8); also “Knowing that you were not redeemed with corruptible
things, like silver or gold, … but with the precious blood of Christ, as of a
LAMB without blemish and without spot. He indeed was foreordained
BEFORE the FOUNDATION of the world, but was manifest in these last times
for you” (1Pe 1:18-20; cp with 2Ti 1:9).
God’s plan of redemption
included creating intelligent beings, who would be made in His image and
likeness (Gen 1:26-27). God created these beings
because He wanted someone He could agapao love, and in return receive agapao
love from them (1Co 2:9; Ja 1:12). Agapao love is a love that
causes a being to surrender himself or herself entirely to the one he or she
loves; for example: “Love [agapao] the LORD your God with ALL your heart, with ALL your
soul, with ALL your mind, and with ALL your strength” (Mk 12:30). This no doubt is the main reason why God gave
angels and mankind the power of self-determination, which is free will; even
though He knew that this great gift would bring sin and misery into His perfect
creation.
In other words, God gave angels
and mankind the power to choose if they wanted to agapao love Him and His Word
or not, for true love can only be given by one’s ability to choose. God does
not want or desire his finest creation to be dumb puppets that He could control
and force to do His will. God is not like Lucifer and his demons, who are
self-centered egomaniacs that want to enslave, control, and force mankind to
serve them. This is the real reason why there is so much suffering in the world
today, and in times past; it is nothing but demon possessed men’s inhumanity to
their fellow men.
God has created man an
independent being that has the power to choose his own destiny; therefore, if a
man or woman wants to be a murder, adulterer, fornicator, whoremonger, or
enslave his fellow man, God is not going to stop him; for He has given man laws
against this, and law-enforcement agency to punish this type of behavior.
Evidently Lucifer and his angels rejected God’s merciful plan of redemption,
for according to scripture they will definitely be lost (Eze 28:12-19; Rev 20:10; 12:7-9).
God being a LOVING and JUST Heavenly Father, knowing the
destiny of all men and angels, therefore devised a plan of redemption for His children
before the world began. God chose to PROVE His love to all of mankind by
becoming a man Himself; and as a man go through all the sufferings of life, and
at the end of His life die the excruciating death of the Cross. He did this so
He could give Eternal Life, that is ETERNALITY, to all beings who would choose
to agape love Him and prove their love by loving and being faithful to His
infallible Word.
The Word of God says it this
way: “For God so loved [agapao] the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that
whoever believes in Him should not perish, but have Eternal Life” (Jn
3:16, NAS); and “We love [agapao] Him because He first loved [agapao] us” (1Jn 4:19; cp with Acts 2:22-40; if any of my beloved readers would like to find out more
about God’s predestinated plan of Calvary, I suggest they read my book: A
Biblical, Medical, and Psychological Account of the Sufferings of the Lord
Jesus Christ, on my website).
God based mankind’s salvation on
his or her falling and staying in agapao love with the Lord Jesus Christ and
His redemption work at Calvary, who is the Creator and the one and only true
God. Every Christian knows that life is hard and full of sinful temptations.
God has NEVER promised His children that they would not go through many hardships
and tribulations in life (Jn 16:13;
2Ti 2:3).
God did promise them that He would be “with” them “always”, and give them “the
peace of God, which surpasses all understanding” (Mt
28:20; Phi 2:6). Even though I have shed my river of tears, I and no other true
Christian who has known and experienced the reality of God’s presence and love,
has any desire to trade it for all the power, fame, and wealth of this world
that Lucifer and his demons can offer mankind!
Conclusion of Biblical Reasoning: According to the infallible
Word of God, the earth was created to be inhabited by mankind. The prophet
Isaiah said it this way: “For thus said the LORD, the Creator of heaven who alone
is God, Who formed the earth and made it, Who alone established it -- He did
not create it a waste, but formed it for HABITATION: I am the LORD, and there
is none else” (Isa 45:18, the Jewish Tanakh
Bible).
Therefore according to all the
above passages of scripture, God created the earth to be inhabited by with
angels and mankind, especially with man’s redemption in mind! Since the Creator
of the universe is omniscience and knows mankind’s past, present, and future,
as well as the secrets of men’s hearts (Acts
15:18; Isa 46:10; Psa 44:21), it does not make any sense to me for God, who is
omnipotent, to wait millions, or hundredths of thousands, or even 50,000 years
to fulfill His plan of redemption for mankind, whom He created just 6,000 years
ago.
I say again, I openly confess
that I do not know when God created the original heavens and earth, and I do
not believe any Christian or Evolutional Scientist knows either. The one thing
all true Christians know for a fact is: God created man (Adam) 6,000 years ago.
The Word of God is very adamant about this great truth and Bible chronology
indisputably confirms it (see my
book, A Calendar of Biblical Dates and Events Beginning with the Creation of
Adam, on my website)!
Scientific
Reasons
C-14
in the Earth’s Atmosphere Is Increasing and Has Not Reached Equilibrium, Proves
that the Earth Is Less than 30,000 Years Old: Creationist Dr. Kent Hovind, in an article entitled
“Does carbon dating prove the Earth is millions of years old,” gives a
brilliant explanation of the C-14 Dating Method and its Fallacies. He declared:
Let me first explain how carbon dating works and then show
you the ASSUMPTIONS it is based on. Radiation from the sun strikes the
atmosphere of the earth all day long. This energy converts about 21 pounds of
nitrogen into radioactive carbon 14. This radioactive carbon 14 slowly decays
back into normal, stable nitrogen.
Extensive
laboratory testing has shown that about HALF of the C-14 molecules will decay
in 5730 YEARS. This is called the HALF-LIFE. After ANOTHER 5730 YEARS half
of the remaining C-14 will DECAY leaving only ? of the original C-14.
It goes from ? to ? to 1/8, etc. In theory it would never totally disappear,
but after about 5 HALF-LIVES the difference is not measurable with any
degree of accuracy. This is why most people say carbon dating is only good
for objects LESS than 40,000 YEARS OLD….
Willard
Libby invented the carbon dating technique in the early 1950’s. The amount of carbon
14 in the atmosphere today (about .0000765%); he [Libby]
ASSUMED there would be the same amount found in living plants or animals
since the plants breath CO2 and animals eat plants. Carbon 14 is the
radio-active version of carbon…. Carbon-14 dating rests on two simple
ASSUMPTIONS. They are, obviously, ASSUMING the amount of carbon-14
in the atmosphere has always been constant, and its rate of
decay has always been constant. Neither of these ASSUMPTIONS is provable
or reasonable…. Present testing shows the amount of C-14
in the atmosphere has been INCREASING since it was first measured in the
1950’s….
Since
solar radiation causes the formation of C-14 in the atmosphere, and normal
radioactive decay takes it out, there must be a point where the formation rate
and the decay rate equalizes. This is called the point of EQUILIBRIUM…. A
freshly created earth would require about 30,000 YEARS for the amount of
C-14 in the atmosphere to reach this point of EQUILIBRIUM because it would
leak out as it is being filled. Tests indicate that the earth has
still NOT reached equilibrium. There is MORE C-14 in the atmosphere now
than there was 40 years ago. This would prove the earth is NOT yet 30,000
YEARS OLD! This also means that plants and animals that lived in the past had
less C-14 in them than do plants and animals today. Just this one fact
totally upsets data obtained by C-14 dating” (http://drdino.com/articles.php?spec=73).
Creational and Evolutional Scientists all know that
there are many things that can cause a loss or gain of C-14 and effect
radiometric dating. Some of these causes are: 1) The strength of earth’s
magnetic field has a major effect on the amount of carbon 14 that is made.
Scientists now know that there has been a fairly rapid weakening of earth’s
magnetic field. 2) Sunspot production radically affects radiocarbon production
in the atmosphere. 3) A change in neutrino radiation into our atmosphere in
earlier times would also affect radiocarbon levels. 4) The amount of cosmic
radiation entering our atmosphere and reaching the earth would also be crucial.
5) Atmospheric changes in moisture content in the
past would also significantly affect C-14 amounts. 6) Rainfall, lakes, oceans,
and belowground moisture will cause a loss of C-14. 7) If the earth was either
warmer at an earlier time or had more water in the atmosphere would
reduce the amount of C-14 in the atmosphere. 8) Massive meteorites striking the
earth or massive volcano eruptions on the earth would have caused massive
amounts of debris to fill the atmosphere, thereby reducing the amount of C-14
in the atmosphere ancient times! Many of these things definitely happen during
the Flood in Noah’s Day, as I will show later!
7
Evidences for a Young Earth: Evolutionists Dr. William
D. Stansfield, a professor of Biological Sciences at California Polytechnic State University, in his book Science
of Evolution has given evidence that the earth is much young that his
fellow evolutional scientists believe. He also reveals that the amount of C-14
in earth’s atmosphere was much LOWER in ancient times. Professor Stansfield
says it this way:
Lower C14 in the
Atmosphere in Past Ages: It NOW appears that the C14
decay rate in living organisms is about 30 PER CENT LESS than its
production rate in the upper atmosphere. Since the amount of C14 is now INCREASING
in the atmosphere, it may be assumed that the quantity of C14 was even
LOWER in the PAST than at the present. This condition would lead
to ABNORMALLY LOW C14/C12 ratios for the older fossils. Such a
fossil would be interpreted as being much older THAN IT REALLY
IS…. Creationists argue that since C14 has not yet reached its equilibrium
rate, the age of the atmosphere must be LESS than 20,000 YEARS
OLD….
Not Enough
Helium-4 In the Atmosphere: The atmospheric content of
helium-4 (the most abundant isotope of helium) has accumulated from the
radioactive decay of uranium and thorium in the earth's crust and oceans, from
nuclear reactions caused by cosmic rays, and from the sun. If the present
rate of accumulation has been constant throughout four billion years
of the earth’s history, there should be THIRTY TIMES as much helium in our present
atmosphere as is presently there….
The Amount of
Water in the Oceans from Volcanoes: It has been estimated that seventy
volcanoes the size of Mexico's Paricutin producing 0.001 cubic mile of water
per year for 4.5 billion years of earth's history could account for the 315
cubic miles of water in the oceans today. There are now approximately 600
active volcanoes and about 10,000 dormant ones. Six hundred volcanoes
comparable to Paricutin could account for the present oceans in approximately
0.5 BILLION YEARS….
Uranium Salt in
the Oceans: Uranium salts presently appear to be accumulating in the
oceans at about 100 times the rate of their loss. It is estimated that
60,000,000,000 grams of uranium is added to the oceans annually. Under
uniformitarian rules, the total concentration of uranium salts of the oceans
(estimated at less than 1E+17 grams) could be accumulated in LESS than
ONE MILLION YEARS….
Not Enough
Meteoric Dust on the Surface of the Earth: One estimate of meteoric dust
settling to earth places it at 14.3 million tons annually. If this rate has
been constant throughout five billion years of geologic history, one might
expect over FIFTY FEET of meteorite dust to have settled all over the surface
of the earth…. The average meteorite contains about three hundred times more
nickel than the average earth rock….
The Immense
Pressure Found In Oil Reservoirs: Some geologist find it difficult
to understand how the GREAT PRESSURES found in some oil wells could be
retained over millions of years….
Today’s Human Population Not Enough: If
humanity is really about 2.5 million years old (as claimed by Dr. Louis
Leakey), creationist calculate from conservative population estimates (2.4
children per family, average generation and life span of forty-three years)
that the world population would have grown from a single family to 10 to the
2700th power of people over one million years. The present world
population is about 2x10 to the 9th power, an infinitesimal part of
the 10 to the 2700th power….
Major Assumptions of Radiometric Dating
System: All the
above methods for dating the age of the earth, its various strata, and its
fossils are QUESTIONABLE, because the RATES are likely to have FLUCTUATED
WIDELY over earth history…. Radiometric dating [may be correct]… if we ASSUME
that: (1) a rock contained NO Pb206 when it was formed. (2) All
Pb206 NOW in the rock was produced by radioactive decay of U238, (3) the rate
of decay has been CONSTANT, (4) there has been NO differential LEACHING by
water of either element, and (5) NO U238 has been transported into the rock
from ANOTHER SOURCE, then we might expect our estimate of age to be fairly
accurate. Each ASSUMPTION is a potential variable, the magnitude of
which can SELDOM be ascertained. In cases where the daughter product is a gas,
as in the decay of potassium (K40) to the gas argon (Ar 40) it is essential
that NONE of the gas ESCAPE from the rock over long periods of time….
Professor Stansfield’s Conclusion: It is OBVIOUS that radiometric
techniques may NOT be the absolute dating methods that they are claimed to
be. Age estimates on a given geological stratum by different radiometric
methods are often quite different (sometimes by hundreds of millions
of years). There is NO absolutely RELIABLE long-term RADIOLOGICAAL
‘CLOCK’ (pp 80-84).
Evidence for a
Young Sun: Keith Davies gives the
following brilliant evidence: According to current models of
stellar evolution, when a star like our sun is very young, its enormous
output of energy is provided by gravitational contraction. As it grows
older, the models show that the source of its energy should change over
to that of nuclear fusion as it slowly develops a very hot and dense
core. Where exactly does our sun fit into this sequence…?
In 1976 a
team of Russian astronomers, writing in the respected British scientific
journal Nature showed how their research pointed clearly to the
startling fact that the sun does NOT even seem to possess a large dense nuclear
burning core. Instead, their results showed the sun as bearing the
characteristics of a very young homogeneous star that corresponds with
the early stages of the computer models.
The
astronomers also proposed that nuclear reactions ‘are not responsible for
energy generation in the sun’ [Nature, 1976, vol 259, pg 89, Observations of Solar Pulsations,
A.B. Severny, V.A. Kotov, and T.T. Tsap]…. They said that such a
conclusion, ‘although rather extravagant,’ follows from their own research into
the analysis of the global oscillations of the sun and is quite consistent with
two other major observational findings. They cited these other evidences as
being the observed absence of appreciable neutrino flux from the sun, and the
observed abundance of lithium and beryllium in the stellar atmosphere….
The
First Evidence for A Young Sun: …if the sun is an old star,
then, according to the ‘standard model,’ it should have a large core….
In particular, the presence of such a large core would mean that the sun’s global
oscillations would range up to a maximum fundamental radial mode of
oscillation of around ONE HOUR [Nature, 1976, vol 259, pg 94, Observation of Free Oscillations of
the Sun, J.R. Brookes, G.R. Isaak, and H.B. van der Raay].
Oscillations
greater than ONE HOUR would involve such enormous amounts of energy
that they would result in the COMPLETE DISRUPTION of any large core that might
be present in the sun [The Sun, published in 1982 by
Michael Beazley in association with the Royal Astronomical Society, pg 84]….
The
Russian astronomers were certainly startled to find that their observations of
the sun were showing large and remarkably stable global oscillations
with a period of 2 HOURS 40 MINUTES sun’ [Nature, 1976, vol 259, pg 88, Observations of Solar Pulsations,
A.B. Severny, V.A. Kotov, and T.T. Tsap] very close to that predicted
for a young homogeneous sun…. A British group soon confirmed the 2 HOUR
40 MINUTES oscillation [Nature, 1976, vol 259, pg 94, Brookes]….
The
British astronomers J. Christenson-Dalsgaard and D.O. Gough commented that in
order to account for the 2 HOUR 40 MINUTE observation it is ‘evident that a
very drastic change in the solar model would be necessary’ and ‘it is unlikely
that any such model can be found’ [Nature, 1976, vol 259, Towards a Heliological Inverse Problem, pg
90]. This striking discovery of the sun’s oscillations is not,
however, the only evidence of a YOUNG SUN.
The
Second Evidence for A Young Sun: The Solar Neutrino Emission is
that of a young star. The Russian team stated that the low neutrino flux, of
the sun also fits in with their proposal that the energy of the sun did not
come from nuclear sources. The low neutrino flux is a well-known and
long-standing problem for modern astronomy.
A group of
solar physicists, writing in the National Research Council publication Decade
of Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics stated
that the neutrino emission from the sun is ‘a problem that has worried
astronomers for years’ and that ‘the discrepancy is serious’ [pg 34]. A low neutrino flux which results in a
correspondingly low temperature of the sun’s core, again fits in perfectly with
the sun being a YOUNG STAR that has NOT yet achieved full nuclear burning of
hydrogen, but is obtaining its energy from a slow gravitational
contraction.
The
Third Evidence for A Young Sun: The Lithium and Beryllium
abundance in the sun is consistent with that of a young star. The article in Nature
stated that ‘the abundance of lithium and beryllium in the solar atmosphere
is another confirmatory evidence that nuclear energy is NOT
responsible for the majority of the energy generation in the sun’ [Nature, 1976, vol 259,
pg 89, Observations of Solar Pulsations].
We know
that lithium would be destroyed in around 7,500 YEARS [Glossary of Astronomy and Astrophysics, pg 102, J. Hopkins], when the central temperature
of a YOUNG STAR reaches 3 million degrees [Fundamental
Astronomy, pg 273, H. Karttunen, P.
Kroger, H. Oja, M. Poutanen, K.J. Donner]. Observations show that the
sun has already lost all BUT around ONE THOUSANDTH of its original
abundance of lithium [Astronomy, 9/95, pg 53, Needles in the Cosmic Haystack, S. Stephens]….
Conclusion: The three
major observational evidences described in this article correlate with the
expected characteristics of a young star that is obtaining its energy
from gravitational contraction. The sun simply does not seem to have a large
core that is very dense and has the high temperature that can sustain hydrogen
nuclear burning. In other words, the sun definitely does NOT show the
characteristics of a multi-billion-year-old star, but instead shows the
characteristics of an exceedingly YOUNG STAR (http://www.icr.org/article/405/;
Keith Davies).
Proof
of Sun’s Oscillation of 2 Hours and 40 Minutes: Nature, in an article by Drs.
A. B. Severny, V. A. Kotov and T. T. Tsap of the Crimean Astrophysical
Observatory, USSR, gave the following web abstract of this article: We have modified our solar magnetograph to measure
velocities at the solar surface, rather than magnetic fields. Using this
apparatus, we have observed fluctuations of period 2 h 40 min, which are
remarkably stable. The interpretation of this phenomenon seems to cause
MUCH THEORETICAL DIFFICULTY (Nature 259,
1/15/76, pp 87-89, article: Observations of Solar
Pulsations; http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v259/n5539/abs/259087a0.html).
The theoretical difficulty
was evidently that “nuclear energy is NOT responsible for the majority of the energy
generation in the sun,” which was proven by “the abundance of
lithium and beryllium” found “in the solar atmosphere.” This abundance of these
elements can only mean that the sun has NOT entered into its nuclear energy
burning phrase as this time!
In a 1983 issue in Nature, we can find an
article entitled Detection of Solar Gravity Mode
Oscillations, in which professors Philippe
Delache and Philip H. Scherrer of the Center for Space Science and Astrophysics at Stanford
University candidly made the same confession: An analysis of solar velocity data obtained at the Stanford
Solar Observatory shows the existence of solar global oscillations in the range
45−105 µHz (160−370 min). These oscillations are interpreted as
internal gravity modes of degree l = 1 and l = 2. A good estimate of the order of the modes has also
been made (http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v306/n5944/abs/306651a0.html;
Nature, vol 306, 12/15/83, pp 651 – 653; also see Dr.
Douglas Gough
article New Data from Solar Oscillations in Nature, 274, 8/24/78, pp 739 - 739).
Proof
of the Sun’s Low Neutrino Flux: Professor Ian W. Roxburgh
of Queen Mary College in London wrote an article in Nature entitled, Internal Rotation of the
Sun and the Solar Neutrino Flux, which stated: The LOW
upper limit of 1 SNU (10-36 captures per 37Cl atom s-1)
on the observed neutrino flux from the Sun obtained by Davis has proved
an EMBARRASSMENT to stellar physicists, and in spite of considerable
intellectual gymnastics the standard [old age] solar models
PREDICT at least 6 SNU (ref. 2). The essential difficulty has been to
produce a model with a low enough central temperature that can still
produce the observed luminosity of the Sun with an AGE of 4.7 
109 yr (an
abstract of the above article can be found at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v248/n5445/abs/248209a0.html;
Nature, vol 248, 3/15/74, pp 209 – 211;).
The embarrassment and
quandary that evolutional stellar physicists evidently experience Is: how does
an evolutional scientist reconcile the observed evidence of low neutrino
flux, which is found in young stars, with an old sun whose age is allegedly
4.7 billion years.
Physics Professors John N.
Bahcall of the Institute for
Advanced Study Princeton, Kenneth Lande of the University of Pennsylvania,
Robert E. Lanou Jr. of the University of Hawaii, John G. Learned of Brown
University, R. G. Hamish Robertson of Los Alamos National Laboratory, and
Lincoln Wolfenstein of Carnegie Mellon University, in a 1995 Nature
article entitled, Progress and Prospects in Neutrino Astrophysics declared: Four separate experiments to detect neutrinos from
the Sun have now confirmed a DEFICIT in the flux relative to the predictions
of STANDARD [i.e. old age sun] theories of nuclear physics (Nature 5/4/95, vol 375, pp 29 - 34; http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v375/n6526/abs/375029a0.html).
Proof
of the Abundance of Lithium in the Sun: SpringerLink
website link contained an abstract of an article entitled, The Solar Lithium
Abundance, which can be found in Solar Physics, volume 41, number 1, March
1975. In this periodical, Drs. Edith A. Muller, Eric Peytremann, and Ramiro de
la Reza of the Observatoire
de Genève in Genève, Switzerland declared: The
SOLAR ABUNDANCE of LITHIUM and its isotopic abundance ratio were determined by
comparing synthetic spectra with the high quality center-to-limb spectra of the
solar lithium feature presented in Paper I by Brault and Müller
(1974).
The
following possible effects on the abundance result were considered:
DEVIATIONS from LTE, atmospheric models, blends by molecular and
atomic lines, hyperfine structure, large scale velocity fields. It was found
that the PHOTOSPHERIC LITHIUM ABUNDANCE is log
Li=1.0±0.1. The greatest
uncertainty is due to DIFFERENCES in the ATMOSPHERIC MODELS (http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00152955;
now at: Départment d'Astrophysique, Université
de Mons, Belgique). The answer to this dilemma is simple, if your
evolutional theory or belief of an old sun is contrary to what observational
evidence reveals, change your atmospheric model to a young sun belief!
SpringerLink website also gave an abstract of an
article entitled Lithium Abundance in Sunspots written by Drs. E. A. Baranovsky
and V. P. Tarashchuk of the Crimean
Astrophysical Observatory. In it these scientists affirmed: The
observations of lithium were carried out with the TST-2 telescope at
CrAO on August 15–20, 2006. A sunspot model was calculated for the dates of
observations. The LITHIUM ABUNDANCE in a sunspot and in the undisturbed photosphere
was determined. It is log (N Li) = 1.35 for the sunspot
and log (N Li) = 1.05 for the undisturbed photosphere
(http://dx.doi.org/10.3103/S019027170801004X; Izvestiya
Krymskoi Astrofizicheskoi Observatorii, 2008, vol 104, pp. 31–40).
Conclusion: Since indisputable
evidence from evolutional Russian, English, and American astronomers and
physicists reveal that the sun is oscillations with a period of 2 HOURS 40 MINUTES, and it does
have a low neutrino flux, and it has an abundance of lithium, which are all
signs of a young star, this is can only mean that our sun is not 4.7 billion
years old but very young. I might
also add, since scientists declare that lithium is destroyed in a young star
around 7,500 YEARS, when the central temperature of a YOUNG STAR reaches 3
million degrees, this can only mean that our sun is probably younger than 7,500
YEARS OLD [see: Glossary of Astronomy and Astrophysics, pg 102,
J. Hopkins; Fundamental Astronomy, pg 273, H. Karttunen, P. Kroger, H.
Oja, M. Poutanen, K.J. Donner]!
Additional
Proof that the Sun Is Young: Science
News in an article entitled “The Faint Young Sun and the Warm Earth” speaks
of the unsolvable problem evolutional scientists face, who believe that the
energy of the sun is produced by thermonuclear fusion; according to this theory
which the crust earth should have been a solid frozen ice sheet millions of
years ago, but the fossil record clearly reveals it had a very warm tropical
climate. In other words, according to evolutional climatologists and geologist,
the earth in ancient times had a much warmer and constant climate than it has
today, but this fact of science is contradictory to the evolutional theory of
thermonuclear fusion, which teaches the sun output of solar energy should be
increasing, and not decreasing, in every year of its existence.
Science News quotes physicists Michael J. Newman of
Cal Tech and Robert T. Rood of the University of Virginia as saying: The
discrepancy… indicates that there is a serious problem with our understanding
of the STRUCTURE of the sun, or of our understanding of the earth's climate or
both (3/5/1977, vol 111, pg 154).
Evolutional astronomer Dr. John Bahcall of Princeton
University, along with Dr. Raymond Davis Jr. of the Brookhaven National
Laboratory, wrote a research report on the problems with the Theory of
Thermonuclear Fusion as the generating power of the sun. In an effort to prove
their believe in this Theory, they dug a deep large underground cavity in a
South Dakota gold mine in an effort to catch neutrinos particles
released during certain nuclear reactions. The neutrino is a particle emitted
during certain nuclear reactions. Trillions of neutrinos are emitted from the sun
every second. Because neutrinos can escape from deep within the sun, scientists
realized they might be a good way of checking whether or not the reactions
believed to power the sun are really happening.
SCIENCE magazine described their scientific experiment and its results this
way: One may well ask, why devote so much effort in trying to
understand a backyard problem like the sun's thermonuclear furnace…? The theory
of solar energy generation is… important to the general understanding of
stellar evolution…. There is a way to directly and quantitatively test the
theory of nuclear energy generation in stars like the sun. Of the particles
released by the assumed thermonuclear reactions in the solar interior,
only one has the ability to penetrate from the center of the sun to the
surface and escape into space:
The
NEUTRINO. Thus neutrinos offer us a unique possibility of ‘looking’ into
the solar interior…. The theory of stellar aging by thermonuclear
burning is widely used in interpreting many kinds of astronomical information
and is a necessary link in establishing such basic data as the
ages of the stars…. Thus an experiment designed to capture
neutrinos produced by solar thermonuclear reactions is a crucial one for
the theory of stellar evolution…. It is for… these reasons… that
so much effort has been devoted to the solar neutrino problem….
For the
past 15 years we have tried, in collaboration with many colleagues in
astronomy, chemistry, and physics, to understand and test the theory of how the
sun produces its radiant energy (observed on the earth as sunlight). All of us
have been SURPRISED by the RESULTS: there is a LARGE UNEXPLAINED DISAGREEMENT
between observation and the supposedly well-established THEORY [of
Thermonuclear Fission that suggests that the sun is millions or billions years
old]. This DISCREPANCY has led to a CRISIS in the theory of stellar
evolution; many authors are openly questioning some of the basic
principles and approximations [i.e. of ages of the universe] in this
supposedly dry (and solved) subject (Science,
1976, vol 191, pp 264-267, article: Solar Neutrinos: A Scientific Puzzle, John
N. Bahcall and Raymond Davis, Jr.).
The Wichita Eagle and Beacon reported the
above experiment this way: Chemist Ray Davis Jr., of
Brookhaven National Laboratory in Brookhaven, N.Y., led a team that set up a
neutrino detector nearly a mile underground at the Homestake Gold Mine in Lead,
S.D. In nearly a decade of operation the detector has found ONLY ONE-THIRD the expected
number of neutrinos…. ‘It seems to me that we’re NOT even at first base
[i.e. in proving this THEORY],’ Bahcall says. ‘We have just realized we
have a ball game and all we know is somebody is out there throwing fastballs at
us and we can’t even SEE them (3/23/1980,
pg 6B).
The reason why these evolutionists cannot understand
why the sun is only emitting one-third of the expected neutrinos is
because the sun is NOT powered by Thermonuclear Fission, which proves
this is a FALSE Theory! The only way to solve this problem, which has become a
nightmare to evolutional scientist, is by them being honest enough to admit
that the Thermonuclear Fission Theory is FALSE. In other words, this Golden
Calf that they worshipped, which supported their pantheistic belief that the
universe is millions and billions years old is nothing but a stumbling-block to
true scientific learning! It can only lead scientists backward into ignorance
instead of forward into true knowledge.
A 19th century scientist by the name of
Hermann von Helmholtz solved evolutionist’s sun problem when he proposed the
Theory of Gravitational Collapse, as a simple and effective model to explain
why the Sun Shines, that is what causes the Solar Energy output of the Sun. The
only reason why evolutionists rejected it was because it did not support their
doctrine of the evolution; for if the sun produced its energy by Gravitational
Collapse, the sun would not be able to shine more than 1 or more million years.
This definitely would not be enough time to support Darwin’s Theory of
Evolution of man and animals.
In fact the great Christian scientist Lord William
Thomson Kelvin (1824-1907) used Helmholtz’s Theory of Gravitational Collapse as
one of his proves of Creation by God, when he debated the evolutionist Thomas
Huxley. This was one of the first Creationism vs Evolution Debates in history,
and as history readily admits, Lord Kelvin tore the evolutionists' position to
shreds with simple and straightforward physical arguments that the earth and
solar system were not old enough for life to have arisen by Darwin's proposed
evolutionary process. Evolutionists were in a quandary until the middle of the
1930s, when Dr. Hans Albrecht Bethe introduced his FALSE Theory of
Thermonuclear Fusion, which evolutionists and the money powers promoted as
science.
Three
Giant Dust Rings Encircling Our Solar System Reveal that the Universe Must Be
Young: Scientists have discovery three giant rings of dust
100 million miles wide circling the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter 200
million to 300 million miles from the sun. The discovery of the rings was made
by observational data coming from the Infrared Astronomical Satellite.
Evolutional scientists were truly amazed and astounded at this discovery, for
it appeared to them to DEFY the known Laws of Physics.
According to the Wichita Eagle and Beacon in
an article entitled Dust Rings in Our Solar System: Particles
this small can only survive in stable orbits for a FEW TEN-THOUSANDS of
YEARS before they are pulled apart by the sun,’ said Frank Low of
the University of Arizona. ‘There must be something that replenishes the rings
because three stable bands that large CANNOT EXIST any other way
(11/10/1983, pg 1A ff, article:).
In other words, if our solar system is millions or
billions of years old, these three extremely stable and symmetrical
rings that encircle the asteroid belt should have pulled apart long before
now, that is according to the Laws of Physics, but if they are only
10,000-30,000 years old, then the existence of these rings would be in perfect
harmony with the known Laws of Physics. When will evolutional scientists give
up their pantheistic religion of evolution, and scientifically deal with the
evidence at hand, instead of making wild unproven conjectures of what might
have happen?
14 Evidences for a Young Earth: Physics Professor
Russell Humphreys gave 14 scientific reasons why the earth had to be young. I
will only give six that does not require a long technical dissertation. He
stated: Here are fourteen natural
phenomena which conflict with the evolutionary idea that the universe is
billions of years old…. Much more young-world evidence exists, but I have
chosen these items for brevity and simplicity…
2.
Too Few Supernova Remnants: According to astronomical
observations, galaxies like our own experience about one supernova (a
violently-exploding star) every 25 years. The gas and dust remnants from such
explosions (like the Crab Nebula) expand outward rapidly and should remain
visible for over a million years. Yet the nearby parts of our galaxy in
which we could observe such gas and dust shells contain only about 200
supernova remnants. That number is consistent with only about 7,000 YEARS worth
of supernovas….
3.
Comets Disintegrate too Quickly: According to evolutionary theory,
comets are supposed to be the same age as the solar system, about five
billion years. Yet each time a comet orbits close to the sun, it
loses so much of its material that it could NOT SURVIVE much longer than about
100,000 years. Many comets have typical ages of less than 10,000
YEARS….
6.
The Earth’s Magnetic field Is Decaying too Fast: The total
energy stored in the earth’s magnetic field (‘dipole’ and ‘non-dipole’) is
decreasing with a HALF-LIFE of 1,465 (± 165) YEARS…. The main result is that
the field’s total energy (not surface intensity) has ALWAYS DECAYED at least as
fast as now. At that rate the field could NOT be more than 20,000 YEARS OLD….
8.
Biological Material Decays too Fast: Natural radioactivity, mutations,
and decay degrade DNA and other biological material rapidly. Measurements of
the mutation rate of mitochondrial DNA recently forced researchers to REVISE
the AGE of ‘mitochondrial Eve’ from a theorized 200,000 years
down to possibly as low as 6,000 YEARS. DNA experts insist that DNA CANNOT
EXIST in natural environments longer than 10,000 YEARS, yet intact strands of
DNA appear to have been recovered from fossils allegedly much older:
Neanderthal bones, insects in amber, and even from dinosaur fossils. Bacteria
allegedly 250 million years old apparently have been revived with no DNA
damage. Soft tissue and blood cells from a dinosaur have astonished experts.
9.
Fossil Radioactivity Shortens Geologic ‘Ages’ to a Few Years:
Radiohalos are rings of color formed around microscopic bits of radioactive
minerals in rock crystals. They are fossil evidence of radioactive decay.
‘Squashed’ Polonium-210 radiohalos indicate that Jurassic, Triassic, and Eocene
formations in the Colorado plateau were deposited within MONTHS of
one another, NOT hundreds of millions of years apart as required by
the conventional time scale. ‘Orphan’ Polonium-218 radiohalos, having no
evidence of their mother elements, imply accelerated nuclear decay and very
rapid formation of associated minerals….
11.
Too much Carbon 14 in Deep Geologic Strata: With
their short 5,700-year half-life, NO carbon 14 atoms should exist
in any carbon older than 250,000 years. Yet it has proven impossible to
find any natural source of carbon below Pleistocene (Ice Age) strata that does
not contain significant amounts of carbon 14, even though such strata are
supposed to be millions or billions of years old. Conventional carbon 14
laboratories have been aware of this anomaly since the early 1980s, have
striven to eliminate it, and are unable to account for it.
Lately the
world’s best such laboratory which has learned during two decades of low-C14
measurements how not to contaminate specimens externally, under contract to
creationists, confirmed such observations for coal samples and even for a dozen
diamonds, which cannot be contaminated in situ with recent carbon. These
constitute very strong evidence that the earth is only THOUSANDS,
not billions, of years old (First published in Impact #384, ICR, June
2005; http://www.icr.org/article/1842).
Dr. Humphreys earned his B.S. degree from Duke
University and his PhD. at Louisiana State University. He worked for Sandia
National Laboratories in Albuquerque, NM for a number of years and was the
co-inventor of special laser-triggered ‘Rimfire’ high-voltage switches. His
worked at the lab included theoretical nuclear physics and radiation
hydrodynamics, in which he helped to produce the world’s first lab-scale
thermonuclear fusion. He is retired and now works with the Institute for
Creation Research. He is an associate professor of physics with them.
Radioactives Isotopes Found in Lunar Soil Prove the Moon is Less than 50,000 Years Old: By the 1950s, evolutional scientists who believed that dinosaurs were millions of years old and the earth was billions of years old, also believed the moon was billions of years old. Therefore, they foolishly predicted from their so-called knowledge of earth science that the moon had a thick layer of dust 20-60 miles deep.
Evolutionist
Isaac Asimov in his first published essay in 1958 wrote: I
get a picture, therefore, of the first spaceship [traveling to the moon],
picking out a nice level place for landing purposes, coming slowly downward
tail-first and sinking majestically out of sight (Asimov on Science: A
Thirty-Year Retrospective, 1989) pp xvi-xvii). In
1971, astronomer Robert T. Dixon wrote in his textbook Dynamic Astronomy:
The
moon was for many years characterized as having a thick layer of dust covering
its surface, into which an object would sink if it landed on the moon (Robert
T. Dixon, Dynamic Astronomy, 1971, pg 14).
Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon,
confirmed on national television that this was his biggest concern at the time
of his first moonwalk. In a television interview, comedian Bob Hope asked Neil
Armstrong what was his greatest fear when he set his foot on the moon’s
surface. Without hesitation Armstrong responded that his greatest fear was the
moon-dust layer that evolutional scientists had told him to expect. Because of
this, NASA first sent an unmanned Lander, which made the discovery that there
is very little dust on the moon’s surface. The reason for this is the
moon is very young.
All of earth watched as the Eagle slowly descended on
the moon’s surface July 20, 1969. Armstrong stepped on the surface of the moon
and said these historical words: “One small step for a man, one
giant leap for mankind.” It was
discovered that the moon only had an average of 3/4 inch, and not more than 2 or 3 inches (5.08 or 7.62 cm) of dust on its
surface. This is the amount evolutional scientists would have expect, if the
moon was 6000-8000 years old at a rate of 1 inch every 10,000 years.
Scientists at the Fourth Lunar Science Conference
wondered how the moon can be very old and not be intensely hot or even melting
from the accumulation of heat from the radiation. Dr. R. L. Wysong speaking of
this in his book The Creation-Evolution Controversy stated:
But the
moon is rigid, and some [scientists] argue the moon has a cool interior. This
rigidity and relative coolness of the moon [given its high level of
radioactivity] speaks for its YOUTH, LESS than 50,000 years old….
Short-lived U-236 and Th-230 [radioactive] isotopes found in lunar materials
are taken as testimony for YOUTH. IF the moon was of great age, the
short-lived isotopes would have long since decayed and thus be
presently absent. Yet they are NOT absent, they are in relative abundance.
Thus, according to this method, the age of the moon should be spoken of in
terms of THOUSNADS of years, not millions or billions (1976, pp 177-178). In other words, the lunar soil showed not only an
abundance of radioactive material, but also types of radiation that simply
should not be in existence IF the moon was very old.
Other Evidence: According to James Perloff in
his book Tornado in a Junkyard, the great pressures now existing in oil
reserves could only have been sustained for a few thousand years at the very
most. He wrote: Why do we see an explosive
gusher when a drill strikes oil? Because oil, like natural gas, is maintained
in the earth at enormously high pressure, about 5,000 pounds per square inch at
a depth of 10,000 feet. Supposedly oil and gas have been lying there for
millions of years. But how could they have lasted that long without leaking or
otherwise dissipating those extreme pressures (1999, pg 136).
Another evidence for a
young earth is: “No meteorites have ever been found in the geologic column” (The New Astronomy, Fred Whipple, pg 207, Comets). Dr. W. A. Tarr declared: For many years, I have searched for meteorites or meteoric
material in sedimentary rocks [the geological strata]…. I have interviewed the
late Dr. G.P. Merrill, of the U.S. National Museum, and Dr. G.T. Prior, of the
British Natural History Museum, both well-known students of meteorites, and neither
man knew of a single occurrence of a meteorite in sedimentary rocks (Meteorites
in Sedimentary Rocks, Science 75, 1932).
If the earth is billions or even
millions of years old, some traces of meteorites should have been found by now
in the depths of the earth! All meteorites found have always been on the
surface of the earth or on the surface of the ocean floor.
Earth’s
Magnetic Field Is Young: Evolutionists have claimed it takes millions of
years for the earth to change it magnetic field from north to south or south to
north. According to what scientists know today, this is just another FALSE
evolutional theory evolutionists have invented to prove the earth is millions
of years old! Science News in an article entitled “Earth's Magnetic Field Follies Revealed” has declared that
professors Robert S. Coe of
the University of California in Santa Cruz, Pierre Camps and Michel Prevot of
the University of Montpellier in France have discovered that the magnetic field
of the earth actually changed in an 8 day period of time.
As they examined an ancient lava flow in a bed
in Oregon, they discovered that Earth's magnetic field moved 6 DEGREES a DAY,
which was a 1000 times faster than what evolutional scientists formerly
believed. According to the article, professor Kenneth A. Hoffman of California
Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo, who was shocked at the
discovery said: It’s a problem. We're talking about something that
happens in WEEKS and that shows the core to be violently active in terms
of the magnetic field.
Professor Paul H. Roberts of the University of California in Los Angeles
commented: these results are almost inconceivable (4/22/1995, R.
Monastersky).
Nuclear Decay Evidence For A Young
Earth: In an
article with this title, Dr. Humphreys wrote: Recent experiments commissioned by the RATE [Radioisotopes and
the Age of The Earth] project
indicate that ‘1.5 billion years’ worth of nuclear decay took place in one or
more short episodes between 4,000 and 14,000 YEARS AGO…. Much Helium Begins in Radioactive Crystals: The
research story starts in the late 1970s at Fenton Hill in the Jemez Mountains
of New Mexico, about twenty miles west of Los Alamos, just west of a large
volcanic caldera. Geoscientists from Los Alamos National Laboratory were
drilling (figure 1) several miles deep into the hot, dry granitic rock beneath
the site to determine how suitable it would be as a geothermal energy source.
They sent
drill core samples to Oak Ridge National Laboratory for analysis.
At Oak Ridge, Robert Gentry, a creationist physicist, and his colleagues ground
up the rock, extracting hard, dense, microscopic crystals called zircons (figure 2, page iii). The zircons, were, as
usual, radioactive. Much of the uranium and thorium in the earth's continental
crust is in zircons, often imbedded in flakes of biotite, a black mica. The zircon-containing mica is
scattered widely throughout the granitic rocks of the crust. The radioactivity
makes helium. As a uranium atom decays in many steps down to a lead atom, it
emits eight alpha particles, each of which is a helium nucleus
composed of two protons and two neutrons….
Much
Helium Is Still in the Zircons:
Helium is a lightweight, fast-moving, and ‘slippery’ atom, not sticking chemically
to other atoms. It can diffuse
through solids relatively fast, meaning that helium atoms wiggle through the
spaces between atoms in a crystal lattice. For the same reason it can leak
rapidly through tiny holes and cracks, making it ideal for leak detection in
laboratory vacuum systems. The rates are so great that those who believe in
billions of years had expected most of the helium produced during the alleged
long ages to have worked its way out of the crust and into the earth's
atmosphere….
Dr. Larry
Vardiman, an ICR [Institute for Creation Research]
atmospheric scientist, has shown that even after accounting for the slow
leakage into space, the earth's atmosphere has only about 0.04% of the helium
it should have if the earth were billions of years old [The
Age of the Earth's Atmosphere: A Study of the Helium Flux through the
Atmosphere, 1990, pg 28].
In 1957
Melvin Cook, a creationist chemist, pointed out this problem in the prestigious
scientific journal, Nature, asking in his title, ‘Where is the earth’s
radiogenic helium? [1957, vol 179, pg 213]’ Radiogenic
means, ‘generated by nuclear decay.’ In nearly half a century, uniformitarian
scientists apparently have not found a good enough answer to publish in Nature.
But creationists have a simple answer: most of the helium has not entered the
earth's atmosphere. It is still in the earth’s crust and mantle. In fact, the
Oak Ridge team found that much of it is still in the zircons! It has not even
had enough time to leak out of the crystals where it originated….
Gentry et
al. used the amounts of lead to calculate how much helium the decay had
deposited in the zircons. Then they measured how much helium was still in the
zircons. Comparing the two gave the percentage of helium still retained in the
zircons, which they published in 1982 [Geophysical
Research Letters, 10/82, 9(10), pp 1129-1130, article:
Differential Helium Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste
Management, by R. V. Gentry, G. J. Glish, & E. H. McBay]. Their
results were remarkable. Up to 58 PERCENT of the radiogenic helium had
NOT diffused out of the zircons….
Experiments
and Theory Needed: Many creationists, knowing how fast helium
diffuses in many materials, believed it would be impossible for that much
helium to remain in the zircons after 1.5 billion years. But we had no specific
data to support our belief. As of 2000 the only reported helium diffusion data
for zircons were ambiguous, and none existed at all for biotite. So the RATE
project commissioned experiments to measure helium diffusion in zircon and
biotite samples specifically from the Fenton Hill borehole….
RATE
Experiments Show How Fast Helium Escapes: Our experiments showed
that we need to account for both diffusion from zircon and biotite, but zircon
is more important…. Our zircon data agree with recently published data from
another site, and both agree with our ‘Creation’ model. The data allow us to
calculate how long diffusion has been taking place—between 4,000 and 14,000
YEARS! The diffusion rates are nearly 100,000 times higher than the maximum
rates the ‘Evolution’ model could allow. That leaves no hope for the 1.5
billion years. For most of that alleged time, the zircons would have to have
been as cold as liquid nitrogen (196ºC
below zero) to retain the observed amount of helium. Such a ‘cryogenic Earth’
model would not help uniformitarians, because it would violate
uniformitarianism (http://www.icr.org/article/302/).
Wikipedia encyclopedia made the following remarks on Dr.
Gentry and the scientific research project of R.A.T.E.: Radiohalos
are microscopic, spherical shells of discolouration in rocks, such as granite,
or biotite caused by the inclusion of radioactive grains in the rock or by
deposition of radioactive material in them…. The phenomenon of radiohalos has
been known to geologists since the early part of the 20th century,
but wider interest was prompted by the claims of creationist Robert V. Gentry
that radiohalos in biotite are evidence for a young
earth (Gentry 1992)….
Robert V. Gentry studied halos which appeared to have
arisen from Po-218 rather than U-238 and CONCLUDED that solid rock must have
been created with these polonium inclusions, which decayed with a HALF-LIFE
of 3 MINUTES. They could NOT have been formed from molten rock which took many
millennia to cool (the standard theory), because POLONIUM DECAYS in a FEW
MINUTES. This is taken by creationists as evidence that the Earth
was formed instantaneously (Gentry
1992)…. Gentry's work has been continued and expanded by the
creationist Radioactivity and the Age of the Earth (R.A.T.E.) project
that was operating between 1997 and 2005 (Wieland 2003). Radiohalos were studied
as part of the R.A.T.E. project by creationists such as Andrew Snelling of
Answers in Genesis, Russell Humphreys, John Baumgardner and Steven A. Austin at
the Institute of Creation Research as well as others at the Creation Research
Society (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiohalo).
Doctor Robert V. Gentry’s Radiohalo
Evidence for a Young Earth: Ex-evolutional
Professor Robert V. Gentry has a master’s degree in physics from the University of Florida, and an honorary doctorate of sciences from Columbia
Union College. He has taught university level math and physics courses, and has
worked in the defense industry. He spent thirteen years as Guest Scientist at
Oak Ridge National Laboratory and is now research physicist with The Orion
Foundation. He is a long-time member of the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, the American Geophysical Union, Research Society of
Sigma Xi, the American Physical Society, and the New York Academy of Sciences;
he is listed in Who's Who in America, and Who’s Who in Science and Engineering;
and he has published numerous articles on radiohalos in science periodicals. In
fact some scientists consider him as a pioneer in Po halos research.
Professor Gentry, who is a renowned research scientist in Nuclear Physics and
Mathematics, defended and promoted evolution for many years until he was convinced
that his research led him to the conclusion of an instantaneous
creation. Thank God, he had the courage to change and become a Creational
Scientist, even though the scientific dogs of the Luciferian Bankers have
persecuted him and have tried to destroy his reputation and the truth of his
work that proves the earth is young.
Dr. Gentry’s research revealed:
The granite basement rocks of earth did not originate from evolutional
processes, such as, the gradual cooling of molten lava, but instead came into
existence in its present solid form almost instantaneously. According to this
great man of science, those solid granite rock formations came into existence
within a space of less than THREE MINUTES time! This is what his
research for over 20 years on Po Halos confirmed.
In other words, the trillions
upon trillions of radiohalos, which are in all granite rocks, boulders,
mountains, and foundation strata of the earth, proves those rocks came into
existence in a solid form within less than 180 SECONDS (Po-218 Halos and the
Origin of Granite)! This fact of science completely destroys the Big Bang
Theory, and Darwin’s Theory, and every other form of evolutionary theory on the
origin of the universe, earth, and man.
The American Association for the Advancement of
Science chose him to present his scientific radiohalo evidence for a Young
Earth to a large group of scientist at a Symposium. He was one of the
scientists they chose to present the creational side of the debate at the
Symposium. Dr. Gentry speaking of this symposium and his Po Halos research in
his book Creation’s Tiny Mystery stated:
A
climactic event in the twenty-year history of my research was the invitation to
speak before the Pacific Division of the American Association for the
Advancement of Science (AAAS) in June 1982. ‘Evolutionists Confront
Creationists’ was the title of a symposium held at the Santa Barbara campus
of the University of California…. About this time Drs. Awbrey and Thwaites, symposium
organizers, sent a letter (dated March 1, 1982) to SOR [Students for Origins
Research a creation-based organization] containing the statement:
‘It would
certainly make the Santa Barbara meetings the most important meetings of the
century, if even one piece of bona fide evidence for creation
could be presented" (emphasis theirs). They further explained they wanted
to see hard data from properly controlled experiments or observations, not
meaningless extrapolations, out-of-context quotations, or vague generalities.
With this challenge in mind, I set out for Santa Barbara to present my
published scientific results in the context of a creation model of origins. A
lively crowd of about 200 scientists was present in the amphitheater
where I spoke on the first afternoon of the day and a half of lectures; my
presentation was video-taped the following day for wider distribution (Battson,
1982).
The
symposium was billed as a collision encounter—‘Evolutionists Confront
Creationists.’ Believing that my published evidences for creation might satisfy
the demand ‘to see hard data,’ I decided to reverse the emphasis of the
symposium and make the theme of my talk ‘Creation Confronts Evolution.’ The
Abstract of my talk, published in the Proceedings of the symposium, shows
how this theme was developed: ‘If the earth was created, it is axiomatic that
created (PRIMORDIAL) ROCKS must now exist on the earth, and if there was a
Flood, there must now exist SEDIMENTARY ROCKS and other evidences of
that event. But, if the general uniformitarian principle is correct, the
universe evolved to its present state only by the unvarying action of known
physical laws, and all natural phenomena must fit into the evolutionary mosaic.
If this fundamental principle is WRONG, all the pieces in the evolutionary
mosaic become unglued.
Evidence
that something is drastically wrong comes from the fact that this basic
evolutionary premise has FAILED to provide a verifiable explanation for
the widespread occurrence of Po halos in Precambrian granites,
a phenomena which I suggest are in situ [i.e. natural or original]
evidences that those rocks were created almost INSTANTANEOUSLY….
I have challenged my colleagues to synthesize a piece of granite with 218Po
halos, as a means of falsifying this interpretation, but have NOT received a
response. It is logical that this synthesis should be possible if the
uniformitarian principle is true.
Underdeveloped
U halos in coalified wood having high U/Pb ratios are cited evidences
for a Flood-related recent (within the past few thousand years)
emplacement of geological formations thought to be more than 100,000,000 years
old. Results of differential He [helium] analyses of zircons
taken from deep granite cores are evidence for a RECENTLY created,
SEVERAL-THOUSAND-YEARS AGO of the earth….’
A
National Forum: In the same month that the AAAS symposium was held,
the nationally circulated physics journal, Physics Today, opened the
pages of their Letters section to the creation/evolution topic…. Objections and
my responses were published in the November 1983, April 1984, and December 1984
issues. Most of these objections reasoned from the assumption of the uniformitarian
principle; hence it was argued that my interpretation of polonium halos
must be incorrect.
Significantly,
NONE of those letters attempted to directly refute the evidence for creation.
And most significantly, there was NO mention of the crucial granite
synthesis experiment…. Thus the ultimate scientific test of any model of
origins hinges on whether its basic premises are true or false. If data are
discovered which contradict either a model’s basic premises, or an undeniable
consequence of those premises, then the model is false regardless of how many
pieces of data can be fitted into it.
Polonium
halos in PRECAMBRIAN granites FALSIFY the entire theory
of evolution because they contradict its basic premise, the uniformitarian
principle. The only way this statement can be refuted is by providing
laboratory evidence showing that granites with polonium halos can form
naturally. I do not believe that a report will ever be published describing
the synthesis of a granite containing even a single 218Po halo, much
less one containing all three types….
Consequently,
I maintain that all attempts to duplicate granite containing the three types of
polonium halos will meet with failure. In brief, the laboratory of
nature has provided both positive, unambiguous evidence for a
primordial origin of polonium halos in granites as well as
decisive, independent evidence against their secondary origin (pp 178-180).
Dr. Gentry’s research may be
summed up in the following statements: In the
late 1800s, scientists began studying rocks with microscopes in order to better
understand their crystals and composition. Learning how to cut rocks into thin
slices, they turned their microscopes on certain rocks, especially granite, and
found small colored concentric circles inside them. It was eventually realized
that these were actually spherical shells that went around a central grain in
the center (something like slicing an onion through the middle, and finding
circles; that is, circles inside circles.) These circles (actually sliced
sections of the spheres) were given the name, ‘halos.’ We today call them
‘radiohalos.’ (The technical term is Pleochroic halos.)
A radiohalo is the mark left around a particle of a
radioactive substance by the radiation coming from the particle. It can only
form in a solid, such as rock; since, in a liquid or in molten rock, the mark
would dissipate and could not be seen…. Polonium 218 (Po 218) has a
half-life of 3 minutes. Its decay is followed by two other alpha halo
producers: polonium 214 (Po 214) and polonium 210 (Po 210). Each one produces a
halo in the granite. When sliced through the central grain, they appear to be
three concentric circles.
1 - There are many polonium 218, 214, and 210 halos in
granite; in fact, careful specimen counts and extrapolations based on them
reveal that there are trillions upon trillions of them in granites all over the
world.
2 - The vast majority of these polonium 218, 214, and 210
radiohalos have no uranium 238 halos with them. Therefore they are primary
polonium halos, and not daughter products of (not made by) uranium 238.
3 - The primary polonium-218 (Po 218) halos are totally
independent of radioactive parents. They are original in all rock in which they
are found. There is no evidence that they were caused by uranium in the central
grain or by passing uranium streams.
4 - These independent Po-218 halos develop their half-life
halo in only three minutes (in other words, they emit radiation for only a few
minutes), so the radiohalos had to be in those rocks when the rocks were first
brought into existence.
5 - The rock in which they are found had to be solid at the
time it was first brought into existence, or those halos could not form inside
it within that three minutes. However, all evolutionary theories say that the
earth was molten for millions of years.
6 - Since Po-218 halos are found by the trillions throughout
all the granite of the world, all of that granite had to originally become
solid in far less than three minutes, when it was first created, in order for
the Po-218 halos to form properly.
7 - Since this granite is the basement rock, forming a thick
layer, with the continents of the world above it and the basalt and magma below
it, all this continental foundation had to be formed solid in less than three
minutes time. With this fact in mind, there is little reason to expect the
magma below and the continents above to have been formed in millions of years,
if the granite between them was formed in less than three minutes.
For example, nearly everyone has dropped an Alka-Seltzer
tablet into a glass of water and watched it fizz away. If you found a glass of
ice with half an Alka-Seltzer tablet in the bottom, and bubbles going up in the
ice, what would you conclude? Obviously the ice froze very quickly, or the
tablet and bubbles would have disappeared. So we can know that the granites
became solid in minutes, or the polonium radiohalos would not have formed.
8 - The alpha-recoil technique has proven that these
isolated, independent Po-218 halos were definitely not caused by "passing
uranium or other radioactive solutions" as theorized by critics of this discovery.
Alpha-recoil research reveals that radioactive damage trails are always left by
passing radioactive solutions.
9 - The granites should not be classified with the igneous
rocks (all of which came from molten rock), but rather as primordial or Genesis
rocks. Granite (generally almost white in color) is original in its present
solid form and is not secondary to a prior cooling from the black basalt
beneath it or from anything else.
10 - Granite with its large crystals cannot be made from any
molten rock, including molten granite! When men melt granite, and then let it
cool, it always reforms itself into ryolite, never into granite. Ryolite has
smaller crystals and looks different. This is another evidence that granite was
not formed from molten rock.
11 - Po-218, Po-214, and Po-210 halos in granite cannot be
reproduced in the laboratory. No one has provided an acceptable explanation of
how independent polonium could have gotten inside those granites in the first
place. It is an impossible situation, but there they are.
12 - Lab tests on polonium halos are often made on mica in
granite. But fluorite, another large granite mineral, also has polonium halos.
Unlike mica, fluorite is a totally solid mineral, and polonium halos imbedded
within it are the same as though they were imbedded in solid, thick, unflawed
glass.
13 - Another strong evidence that the independent polonium
halos are unique, and not daughter products of uranium, is in the fact that the
ring structures of polonium are different than those in uranium-chain halos.
The sunburst pattern of delicate needle fission tracks, always seen in uranium
radiohalo chains after etching, is totally missing from polonium radiohalos….
19 - Analysis of zircon crystals, from five levels of hot
rock in a 15,000-foot hole, revealed that almost no increase of lead escape had
occurred at even the lowest level. This is powerful evidence in favor of a
young earth and is consistent with a 6000-year age.
20 - Analysis of helium content in those small zircon crystals
revealed amazingly high retention in 197° C (386.6o F) zircon crystals. This
provides a double proof for a very young age for the earth. If the earth were
millions of years old, that helium would have totally escaped from the zircon
crystals.
21 - The lead-206/lead-207 ratio is too high, which is
additional evidence that the independent polonium halos were not originally
derived from uranium.
Scientific
Research Articles Written by Professor Gentry: The scientific articles that Dr. Gentry has written over
years of research has appeared in some of the most prestigious science
periodicals in the world; these articles are indisputable proof that anyone who
would characterize him as a scientific novice, or an unscrupulous scientific
religious fanatic, is without a doubt a liar! These articles listed from the
earliest to the latest are:
1966-1968: Abnormally Long Alpha-Particle Tracks in Biotite
(Mica) (Applied Physics Letters, 1966, vol 8, pg 65); Alpha Radioactivity of UNKNOWN ORIGIN and the
Discovery of a New Pleochroic Halo (Earth and Planetary Science
Letters, 1966, vol 1, pg 453).
Extinct Radioactivity and the Discovery of a New Pleochroic Halo (Nature,
1967, vol 213, pg 487);
Fossil Alpha-Recoil Analysis of Variant Radioactive Halos (Science,
1968, vol 160, pg 1228).
1970-1979: Giant Radioactive Halos: Indicators of UNKNOWN
Alpha-Radioactivity (Science, 1970, vol 169, pg 670)? Radioactive Halos and the Lunar Environment (Proceedings
of the Second Lunar Science Conference, 1971, vol 1, pg 167); Radiohalos: Some Unique Pb Isotope Ratios and
UNKNOWN Alpha Radioactivity (Science, 1971, vol
173, pg 727); Ion Microprobe
Confirmation of Pb Isotope Ratios and Search for Isomer Precursors in Polonium
Radiohalos (Nature, 1973, vol 244, pg 282).
Radioactive Halos (Annual
Review of Nuclear Science, 1973, vol 23, pg 347); Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological
Perspective (Science, 1974, vol 184, pg 62); ‘Spectical' Array of 210Po Halo
Radiocentres in Biotite: A Nuclear Geophysical Enigma (Nature,
1974, vol 252, pg 564);
Evidence for Primordial Superheavy Elements (Physical Review
Letters, 1976, vol 37, pg 11);
Time: Measured Responses (EOS Transactions of the
American Geophysical Union, 1979, vol 60, pg 474).
1980-1989: Polonium Halos (EOS Transactions of the
American Geophysical Union, 1980, vol 61, pg 514). Lead Retention in Zircons (Science,
1984, vol 223, pg 835); Radiohalos in Radiochronological and Cosmological Perspective (“Evolutionists Confront Creationists”, conference: Proceedings
of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Division. American Association for
the Advancement of Science, 1984, vol 1, pp 38-65); Radioactive Halos:
Implications for Creation (The
Proceedings of the First International Conference on Creationism, 1986, vol
1, pp 89-112); Radioactive
Halos: Implications for Creation (Proceedings of the First
International Conference on Creationism, 1987, vol 2, pg 89); and Radioactive Halos: Geologic Concerns (Creation
Research Society Quarterly, 1989, vol 25, pg 176).
Scientific
Research Articles Composed of the Combined Labor of Professor Gentry and Other
Research Scientists: Dr. Gentry,
along with other research scientists who worked with him, have written science
articles on Radiohalos such as:
1976-1978: Radiohalos and Coalified Wood: New Evidence Relating
to the TIME of Uranium Introduction and Coalification (Science,
1976, vol 194, pg 315, R.V. Gentry, W. H. Christie, D. H.
Smith, J. E. Emery, S. A. Reynolds, R. W. Walker, S. S. Cristy, & P. A.
Gentry).
Implications on Unknown
Radioactivity of Giant and Dwarf Haloes in Scandinavian Rocks (Nature,
1978, vol 274, pg 457, R.V. Gentry, W. H. Christie, D. H.
Smith, J. W. Boyle, S. S. Cristy, & J. F. McLaughlin);
1982: Differential Lead Retention in Zircons: Implications
for Nuclear Waste Containment (Science, 1982, vol 216, pg
296, R. V. Gentry, T. J. Sworski, H. S. McKown, D. H. Smith,
R. E. Eby, W. H. Cristie);
and Differential Helium Retention in Zircons: Implications for Nuclear Waste
Containment (Geophysical Research Letters, 1982, vol 9, pg
1129, R.V. Gentry, G. Glish, & E. R. McBay).
Astronomer Barry Setterfield and His
C-decay Evidence for a Young Earth: The truth is as the following
articles will prove, the speed of light, which Red Shift dating of the Universe
and Radiometric dating of rocks is based on, was much greater in times past,
and it has been slowly decreasing until the 1980’s; from that time on, the
speed of light has been increasing.
Wikipedia encyclopedia speaking
of decreasing speed of light (C-decay) problem of evolutionists stated: In 1981 creationist Barry Setterfield suggested that the speed
of light was changing, and was MUCH HIGHER ten thousand years ago than
it is currently. This would enable light from very distant galaxies to reach
Earth in the few thousand years available. The data to support this
claim was taken from a number of different sources…. According to
Setterfield, Romer's measurement results in a SPEED of 301,300, implying that
the speed of light has SLOWED by about 1,300 KM/SEC over the last 300
YEARS…. The speed of light is INGRAINED into most of modern physics, meaning
that changes to this value would have wide-reaching and sometimes non-obvious
effects. None of these effects can be seen either
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starlight_problem).
Setterfield’s brilliant
research was based on scientific experiments on the speed of light from
scientists from 1676 to the present time, and scientists of today in several
different fields of science, who have definitely confirmed in scientific
journals that the speed of light was much faster in ages past than it is today.
Therefore, let’s scrutinize what Setterfield has to say about the speed of
light. In an article entitled “Setterfield Simplified” speaking of the ways time
is measured he wrote:
In the
Bible, God says He stretched the heavens. He says this TWELVE TIMES. The
difference between the idea of the ‘Big Bang’ and the Biblical explanation is
that the Big Bang says the expansion continues to this day, whereas the
Bible says it was a one time, complete event…. Is the Bible right when
it indicates that the universe is NOT expanding anymore? If the
universe is expanding, and if this expansion is causing the redshift, then we
should be seeing redshift measurements all the way from zero to the farthest
measurement seen in a series of smoothly increasing numbers. It should look
like a car accelerating along a freeway, going smoothly from entry speed up to
the speed limit. But that is not what we see in the redshift measurements.
What we
see are a small series of jumps. The measurements are sort of
clumped together and then there is a jump, or jerk, to a new set of
measurements, with nothing gradual in between…. How strange! Is the
universe expanding in jumps and starts? That's hard to cope with. Especially
when some of these redshift groupings split right in the middle of some
galaxies! Which they do. If the universe is NOT expanding, what is causing the
redshift? And the jumps we see? What is REALLY going on…? So what is going on?
Just a series of mistakes where measurements of redshifts and atomic masses and
Planck's constant and the speed of light are all concerned? Or is there
something affecting all of this together?
The key to
all of this appears to be in the ZPE, the Zero Point Energy, and its
INCREASE with TIME. But where is it coming from? What has caused it…? As the
heavens were stretching out, they were separated and started whirling
about. This separation and whirling by these little tiny charged particles
was the origin of the Zero Point Energy. Their activity does NOT depend on
temperature (that's the Zero Point part) or any bits of atomic or subatomic
masses (that's the Energy part)…. As the ZPE was building through time, matter
itself tried to resist the change, just like if you try to push a glass of
water across a table it will not move at first and then jerk forward a
bit. And, unless you push even harder, the glass will continue to move
in jerks across the table. This is because it takes a particular level of
energy from you to build up enough to shift the glass.
Atoms are
the same way. As the ZPE built up, atoms and their composite particles would resist
the change until it could no longer be resisted, then they would react,
absorbing that amount of energy change, and so moving to a higher energy
state. And every time an atom took up a higher energy state, the atom
would emit light that was a little more energetic, or bluer. The red end
of the color spectrum is the lower energy level, and the blue end a
higher energy level. If the ZPE and the reactions of atoms are the way this
describes, then we would expect to see jumps and starts in the
redshift measurements as we look out into space (and thus back into time)
[i.e. the jumps and starts in redshift measurements will be seen IF the present
day speed of light is used, and not the ACTUALLY speed of light that was much
faster in past times]….
And there
is one more bit of data: time is measured by two different clocks, and
they run at different speeds. Our CALENDAR CLOCK is a measure of
‘ORBITAL’ or ‘dynamical’ TIME. It measures the days and months
and years by the earth's rotation, and the orbit of the moon around the
earth and the earth around the sun. This measurement of time depends on
gravity. It is the measure of time man is told to make in Genesis 1:14 by God.
It is quite steady. The other way to measure time is ATOMICALLY - or the speed
at which atomic processes take place. This clock has actually been
measured at moving at a speed DIFFERENT from orbital time. In other
words, when radiometric dating declares a rock to be a million years old, that
does NOT mean the earth has orbited the sun a million times since the rock was
formed. It means that IF atomic processes have ALWAYS been the SAME
[i.e. at the same present day speed of light] then the earth would have been
orbiting the sun a million times.
However
the ZPE strength affects the speed of atomic processes! It is interesting that
in every decay rate equation, we find either the speed of light
IN the numerator or its opposite, Planck's constant, in the denominator! We
know that 'hc' (Planck's Constant multiplied by the speed of light) is a
constant. That has been measured and checked numerous times. But that does NOT
require either 'h' or 'c' to be constant. It does require that if ONE
has CHANGED, then the other has, too - but in the opposite
direction. And THEY HAVE. As the speed of light has been measured going down,
Planck's Constant has been measured as going up. And the faster the speed
of light (or the lower Planck's Constant) in the past, the faster
the radiometric decay rate. So, for instance, if the speed of light were
one million times its current speed, then a million atomic years would be
measured in the space of ONE of earth’s circuits about the sun [i.e., a million
atomic years would equal 1 orbital or solar year]
(http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/simplified.html).
In an article entitled “A Clue from Light from Distant Galaxies,” this
creational astronomer declared: These two papers cite observational
evidence that indicates light-speed, c, has DROPPED EXPONENTIALLY from an
INTIAL VALUE of the order of 6 x 1011 TIMES its current
speed. The evidence comes from light emitted by galaxies near the
frontiers of the cosmos, which has a signature in it that reveals the value of
c at the moment of emission. This signature allows the behavior of light-speed
over time to be determined astronomically, in addition to the
ground-based observations over the last 350 years.
These two
papers demonstrate that the atomic clock, whereby the age of the rocks, the
fossils, the planets and stars have all been determined, ticks at a
rate dependent upon c [i.e. the speed of light]…. As the behavior of c with
time has thereby been established from observation, it is then
possible to CORRECT the atomic clock to read actual orbital time (7th June, 2001;
http://www.setterfield.org/000docs/earlyhist.html; Barry Setterfield, Box 318,
Blackwood SA 5051, Australia).
Barry Setterfield also declared: I am not
infallible and do not claim to have all the facts here. But the same situation
prevails in any field of scientific endeavor, and that is why research
continues…. It should also be noted that a number of qualified scientists who
do not share my beliefs [i.e. on creationism] have also come to a similar
conclusion to mine. Not only have Moffat, Albrecht and Magueijo and others
pointed out that the speed of light was SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER in the
PAST, but Barrow has also suggested that it may still be continuing to change….
Questions
on the Minimum Value of c [i.e. c represents the Speed of Light]…. This issue
was discussed in the literature when c was actually measured as varying.
In Nature, page 892 for June 13, 1931, V. S. Vrkljan answered this
question in some detail. The kernel of what he had to say is this: ‘...a simple
calculation shows that within the last fifty years the index of
refraction [of the atmosphere] should have INCREASE by some (6.7 x10-4)
in order to produce the observed DECREASE (in c) of 200 km/sec….
First,
there was a continuing discussion in the scientific literature as to why the
measured values of c were DECREASING with time. It was a recognized
phenomena. In October of 1944, N. E. Dorsey summarized the situation. He
admitted that the idea of c decay had ‘called forth many papers.’ He went on to
state that ‘As is well-known to those acquainted with the several
determinations of the velocity of light, the definitive values successively
reported... have, in general, DECREASED monotonously [uniformly] from Cornu's 300.4
megametres per second in 1874 to Anderson's 299.776 in 1940.
In Setterfield’s article entitled “Light-Speed and
the Early Cosmos” he reveals that not only the above modern day evolutionists,
but other evolutional scientists from various fields of science, have
emphatically and unequivocally declared that the speed of light was much faster
in ages past. Setterfeild wrote:
The issue
of light-speed in the early cosmos is one which has received some attention
recently in several peer-reviewed journals. Starting in December 1987, the
Russian physicist V. S. Troitskii from the Radiophysical Research Institute in
Gorky published a twenty-two page analysis in Astrophysics and Space Science
regarding the problems cosmologists faced with the early universe. He
looked at a possible solution if it was accepted that light-speed
continuously DECREASED over the lifetime of the cosmos, and the
associated atomic [probably clock] constants varied
synchronously. He suggested that, at the origin of the cosmos, light may have
traveled at 1010 times its current speed. He concluded that
the cosmos was static and NOT expanding.
In 1993,
J. W. Moffat of the University of Toronto, Canada, had two articles published
in the International Journal of Modern Physics D (see also 75). He
suggested that there was a HIGHER VALUE for 'c' during the earliest moments
of the formation of the cosmos, following which it rapidly dropped to
its present value. Then, in January 1999, a paper in Physical Review D by
Andreas Albrecht and Joao Magueijo, entitled ‘A Time Varying Speed Of Light As
A Solution To Cosmological Puzzles’ received a great deal of attention. These
authors demonstrated that a number of serious problems facing cosmologists
could be solved by a very HIGH INITIAL SPEED OF LIGHT.
Like
Moffat before them, Albrecht and Magueijo isolated their high initial
light-speed and its proposed dramatic DROP to the current speed
to a very limited time during the formation of the cosmos. However, in the same
issue of Physical Review D there appeared a paper by John D. Barrow,
Professor of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Cambridge. He took this
concept one step further by proposing that the speed of light has
DROPPED from the value proposed by Albrecht and Magueijo DOWN to its current
value over the lifetime of the universe.
The London
Sunday Times in an article entitled ‘Speed of light 'slowing down’ by Steve
Farrar their Science Correspondent reported: “Dr Joao Magueijo, a Royal Society
research fellow at Imperial College, London, and Dr Andreas Albrecht, of the
University of California at Davis, say the speed of light immediately after the
universe was born may have been FAR FASTER than its present-day value of
186,000 miles a second. They say it has been SLOWING DOWN ever since. ‘If
it’s true, it would be a very big leap forward that will affect our
perception of the universe and much of theoretical physics,’ said Magueijo.
The effects predicted by the theory are to be published in the scientific journal, Physical Review D. One mystery that it seems to be able to explain is why the universe is so uniform - why opposite extremes of the cosmos that are too far apart to have ever been in contact with each other appear to obey the same rules of physics and are even at about the same temperature. It would only be possible for light to cross from one side to the other if it traveled MUCH FASTER than today moments…. Their hypothesis suggests it was SO FAST that it could have been traveling at 186,000 miles a second multiplied by a figure with 70 ZEROES after it. ‘It is remarkable when you can find one simple idea that has so many appealing consequences,’ said John Barrow, professor of astronomy and director of the Astronomy Centre at the University of Sussex, who has collaborated with Magueijo and Albrecht” (http://www.sunday-times.co.uk; 25543).
According to Setterfield: An article
in New Scientist for July 24, 1999, summarized these proposals in the
first sentence. ‘Call it heresy, but all the big cosmological problems will
simply melt away, if you break one rule, says John D. Barrow - the rule
that says the speed of light never varies.’ Interestingly, the initial
speed of light proposed by Albrecht, Magueijo and Barrow is 1060
times its current speed. In contrast, the redshift data give a far less
dramatic result. The most distant object seen in the Hubble Space Telescope
has a redshift, 'z', of 14. This indicates light-speed was about 9 (108)
GREATER than now. At the origin of the cosmos this rises to about 2.5
(1010) TIMES the current value of c, more in line with
Troitskii's proposal, and considerably more conservative than the Barrow,
Albrecht and Magueijo estimate. This lower, more conservative estimate is
also in line with the 1987 Norman-Setterfield Report
(http://www.ldolphin.org/setterfield/earlycosmos.html; Barry Setterfield,
January 24, 2000).
In Settlefield’s
questions and answers section of his website, Malcom Bowden asked a question on
the age of the geological column. Settlefield answered: First, the
redshift observations show a systematic DECREASE in the speed of
light. In fact the redshift data have allowed the cDK curve to be
formulated with some exactness. It is a smooth exponential-type decline
with a very small oscillation superimposed. As a result of the redshift data, the
value of light-speed at any time in the past can be fairly closely determined.
Second, it
is established from the physics of the situation that some atomic processes,
including radiometric decay are light-speed dependent. More correctly, both light-speed
and radioactive decay are mutually affected by the increasing energy density of
the ZPE. Thus, as light-speed is smoothly dropping with time, SO
IS the rate of radioactive decay upon which radiometric dates are
dependent. The redshift data reveal that… radiometric ages dropped from 14
billion years DOWN to a FEW THOUSAND YEARS on the atomic clock….
Evolutionists
have been puzzled by some interesting facts. The asteroid impacts that ended
the Mesozoic [allegedly 65 mya] would have been expected to wipe out the
dinosaurs…. The speed of light at that point in time was about 500,000 TIMES its
current speed, so that 2 million years were just 4 years of actual time
- soon enough after the catastrophe and the changing conditions it brought. The
second puzzle that evolutionists have that has received a lot of attention in
the Creationist press is the so-called ‘DISCORDANT’ radiometric dates
[i.e. dates that disagree with each other]. There is a good reason for this,
too. During much of the Palaeozoic (supposedly 570-250 mya], light-speed was
around 1.5 to 2 MILLION TIMES its current speed (10/22/1999).
Science Daily in article entitled “Speed Of Light May Not Be
Constant, Physicist Suggests” stated: A University of Toronto
professor believes that one of the most sacrosanct rules of 20th
century science -- that the speed of light has always been the same - is
WRONG…. John Moffat of the physics department disagrees - light once traveled
MUCH FASTER than it does today, he believes. Recent theory and observations
about the origins of the universe would appear to back up his belief. For
instance, theories of the origin of the universe -- the ‘Big Bang’ - suggest
that very early in the universe’s development, its edges were farther apart
than light, moving at a constant speed, could possibly have traveled in that
time…. Moffat's theory - that the speed of light at the beginning of
time was MUCH FASTER than it is now - provides an answer to some of these
cosmology problems…. Moffat's paper, co-authored with former U of T researcher
Michael Clayton, appeared in a recent edition of the Journal Physics Letters” (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/10/991005114024.htm;
this was a University of Toronto Release, 10/6/99, contact: Bruce Rolston, U of
T Public Affairs, (416) 978-6974, at bruce.rolston@utoronto.ca).
Since evolutionists
dated rocks and the universe on todays speed of light, INSTEAD of the speed
of light in AGES PAST, Setterfield’s research has a devastating effect
on evolutionists’ claim of an earth billions or even millions of years old. In
other words, the Theory of Evolution is based on the speed of light being a fix
constant of a 186, 282.34 miles per second or 299,792.46 km per second. Since
the speed of light was much greater 12,000 years ago, rocks on earth and the
Red Shift light of stars would date thousands of years, instead of millions and
billions years on the solar clock!
Oh no that would totally
destroy Satan’s Theory of Evolution. Now you know no good devil could allow
that to happen, so this is why evolutionists have gotten out their propaganda
machines to destroy the work and reputation of scientists like Setterfield and
Robert Gentry! Since evolutionists cannot destroy or disprove their research
scientifically, they must use sly misleading remarks or Hilter’s Satanic Big
Lie tactics to accomplish this evil task. The highly technical papers “The Atomic Constants, Light and Time”, by
Barry Setterfield and Trevor Norman, 1987, and the “Behavior of the Zero Point
Energy and Atomic Constants”, by Barry Setterfield, updated 9/17/2007, are both
given at the end of this book in chapter entitled “Research Papers”.
Conclusion: As one sincerely evaluates all the above scientific
data, an honest person should be able to perceive that the earth is no more
than 12,000-18,000 years old. I might also add, when one understands God’s
loving purpose in creating man, and His redemption plan for man that
He designed before He even created the universe, it is not hard to
realize that God created the earth and heavens for man’s benefit. In other
words, God truly desires CHILDREN, someone He can agapao love and would agapao
love Him in return, so He can make them eternal beings that would be with Him
throughout eternity. Because of this great truth of the Word of God, it would
make absolutely no sense for the almighty God, the Creator of the universe, to
wait billions, millions, or even 50,000 years to fulfill His redemption plan of
Calvary! Therefore the earth is probably no older than 12,000 years!!
Genesis
1:2: The Early History of the Original Earth and Its Destruction
“The earth was [hayâh -
BECAME] without form [tohuw - waste land], and void [bohuw - empty]; and DARKNESS was on the
face of the deep. And the Spirit of God was hovering over the face of the
WATERS.”
Hebrew Lexical
Definition: The Hebrew verb hayah appears 3,540 times in Biblical
Hebrew and it has a very wide range of semantic meanings depending on the context. The Theological Wordbook of
the Old Testament defined hayah as: to be,
BECOME, exist, happen…. There are instances, however, where hayâh is used
with a PREDICAT ADJECTIVE: (a) in the description of a PAST situation, which
no longer exists… (Gen 1:2) (#491.0, Drs. R.
Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer Jr., Bruce K. Waltke).
The GESENIUS Hebrew-Aramaic
and English Lexicon of the Old Testament defined hayah as: fall out, come
to pass, BECOME, be… arise, appear, come… Gn 2:7 (J) And the man BECAME a living soul… Gn
2:10 (J) and it BECAME four heads… Ex 4:3 and it BECAME a serpent, v:4, 7:10,
Is 1:22, Dt 26:5… Gn 11:3 (J) and the bricks BECAME (served as) stone for them…
Gn 20:12 (E) cf. 24:67… 1S 22:2 and he BECAME over them prince (#2381, Drs. Francis Brown, S.R. Driver, and Charles Briggs). This translation of the Hebrew
word hayâh can also be verified by the examples of following two passages of
scripture: “Hebron
therefore BECAME [hayâh] the inheritance of
Caleb” (Jos 14:14); or “Therefore it BECAME [hayâh] a proverb” (1Sa 10:12).
Hebrew Grammar
Construction: In both of the above passages of scripture, as well as Genesis 1:2, the
verb hayâh is in the active voice, perfect tense, 3rd person, and
singular number. The perfect tense, as I stated above, simple means COMPLETED
ACTION in the PAST. At the beginning of the second century Jewish sages, that
is Jewish Hebrew scholars, who wrote the Targum of Onkelos, which is the
earliest of the Aramaic versions of the Old Testament, translated this verse
as: “the
earth was laid waste.” Therefore the Hebrew language led them to interpret
this verse as destruction.
Dr. Gleason Archer, a professor
of biblical languages, in his book entitled A Survey of Old Testament
Introduction made the following comment on this verse: It should be noted in this connection that the verb… in
Genesis 1:2 may quite possibly be rendered ‘BECAME’ and be construed to mean: ‘And the earth BECAME formless and void.’ Only a
cosmic catastrophe could account for the introduction of chaotic confusion into
the original perfection of God’s creation. This interpretation certainly seems
to be exegetically tenable (1974, pg 184; found in
BibleWorks V 7.0).
In a footnote Professor Archer
noted: Properly speaking, this verb hayah
NEVER has the meaning of static being like the copular verb ‘to be.’ Its basic
notion is that of becoming or emerging as such…. Sometimes a
distinction is attempted along the following lines: hayah means ‘become’ only
when it is followed by the preposition le; otherwise there is no explicit idea
of becoming. But this distinction will NOT stand up under analysis. In Gen 3:20
the proper rendering is: ‘And Adam called the name
of his wife Eve, because she BECAME the mother of all living.’ No le
follows the verb in this case. So also in Gen 4:20: ‘Jabal
BECAME the father of tent dwellers.’ Therefore there can be no
grammatical objection raised to translating Gen 1:2: ‘And
the earth BECAME a wasteness and desolation.’
The Bible definitely declared
that the earth was NOT a waste place (tohuw) when God first created it: “For thus says the LORD, who
created the heavens; ‘(He is the God who formed the earth and made it, He
established it and did NOT CREATE it a WASTE PLACE [tohuw], But formed it to be inhabited), ‘I am the LORD,
and there is none else” (Isa 45:18, NAS). Since the infallible Word of
God definitely and emphatically declares that God did not create the earth a
waste place (tohuw), it therefore had to go
through some form of destruction to become one.
The one and only God clearly
declared that He laid out the original earth with very precise measurements and
dimensions. In the book of Job, we read: “Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?
Tell Me, if you have understanding. Who determined its measurements? Surely you
know! Or who stretched the line upon it? To what were its foundations fastened?
Or who laid its cornerstone, when the morning stars sang together, and all the
sons of God shouted for joy [i.e. God’s angels]?
Or who shut in the sea with doors, when it burst forth and issued from the womb
[i.e. under the crust of the earth]; When I
made the clouds its [i.e. the ocean’s]
garment, and thick darkness its [i.e. the ocean’s] swaddling band; when I fixed My limit for it, And set
bars and doors; when I said, ‘This far you may come, but no farther, And here
your proud waves must stop,” that is, God fixed the ocean’s boundaries (Job 38:4-11)!
Tell me brother theologian, does
any of this sound like our God made the earth haphazardly? Tell me why would
the angels of God shout for joy at God creating a shapeless dark massive blob
in the heavens? Tell me would that cause you to shout for joy, if you actually
witness creation taking place? I do not think so! Therefore, this verse
definitely could be translated as: the earth “BECAME [hayâh] desolate or a waste place and empty.” This translation would
definitely reveal there was an unknown period between God’s original perfect
creation of the earth described in Genesis 1:1 and the earth becoming a waste
place and empty in verse 2.
Some bible commentators called
this belief “the gap theory,” which they mistakenly attribute its origin to Dr.
Thomas Chalmers of the 19th century instead of to early Jewish
sages. This belief was later championed by Dr. Cyrus Scofield of the 20th
century. Some theologians believe verse 2 of Genesis is referring to how God
original created the earth, that is, without form or shape and desolate. In
other words, they describe it much like the pantheistic religions of nature
worship describe it, when they use the word chaos, which will be discussed
later. If God really made the earth in this evolving evolutional chaotic way,
then it would definitely contradict what God said through the above prophets
concerning His original creation activities.
These theologians use the
following passage in Exodus as their proof text that Genesis 1:1-25 is speaking
of the original creation: “For in six days the LORD made [`asah - prepared] the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in
them, and rested the seventh day” (Exo 20:11). The Hebrew verb `asah
is used in the OT 2,633 times and has been translated many different ways. Hebrew Lexical Definition: Dr. James Strong in Strong’s
Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible defined it as: to do or make, in the broadest sense and widest
application (as follows): …fashion… finish… made… FURNISH… PREPARED (#
6213).
In all of the following passages
of scripture, no one could claim that the Hebrew verb `asah is
being used to mean something is being create or made, but it does mean something
is being prepared or being made ready for use: “Then Adonijah… prepared [`asah] for himself chariots and horsemen, and fifty men to run
before him” (1Ki 1:5); or “And he had prepared [`asah]
for him a large room, where previously they had stored the grain offerings, the
frankincense, the articles, the tithes of grain, the new wine and oil”
(Neh 13:5); or “For she did not know That I gave
her grain, new wine, and oil, And multiplied her silver and gold -- Which they
prepared [`asah] for Baal” (Hos 2:8).
Therefore the above scripture in
Exodus could be translated: “In six days the LORD PREPARED [`asah] the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in
them, and rested the seventh day.” This translation would thus reveal a restoration and
not a creation. This translation would be in perfect harmony with all the above
scriptures God gave us to reveal the restoration He performed in the first 4
days and the creation He performed in the 5th and 6th
day.
Theologians, who teach a 6 day
creation instead of restoration, would have to say in all honesty that they
believe the passages of scripture above in Genesis and Isaiah cannot be taken
in a literal sense, including its grammar and words, but must be taken in a
spiritual way. They would have to interpret the above passages using the
allegorical method, which the Jewish priest Philo and ancient Catholic Priests
used, which was developed in the schools of Alexandria Egypt.
When any Christian uses this
abominable method of interpretation, they can make the Bible say whatever their
imagination can fantasize. I definitely believe in and use the ancient
Antiochian historical-literal school of interpretation, whereby God said what
He meant and meant what He said. I believe the Word of God is infallible in the
ORIGINAL LANGUAGES it was written in!
The Word of God definitely
declared that there was MORE than one generation, history, or birth of the
earth and the atmospheric heavens. God speaking through Moses of His
original creation said: “These are the GENERATIONS [towledah] of the heaven and of the earth when they were created [bara’], in the DAY [yowm – singular number] that the LORD God made [yasar] earth and heaven” (Gen 2:4, Jewish Publication
Society Bible- JPS); other translations of this verse read thus: “These are the HISTORIES of the
heavens and the earth” (Darby’s Literal Translation of the Bible), and “These are BIRTHS of the heavens
and of the earth” (Young’s Literal Translation of the Bible, also
see KJV, ASV, & RSV).
Hebrew Lexical
Definition: According to Dr. Strong, the Hebrew noun towledah means: (plural only) descent, i.e. family, (figuratively) history:
birth [or] generations (#8435); since this noun is PLURAL, it must mean there was
more than one generation, history, or birth of the atmospheric heavens
and earth. Because the Hebrew noun yowm is in the singular number and
not in the plural number, as in several days such as 6 days, this passage must
be declaring that God created and formed the three layers of the atmospheric
heaven and earth in ONE DAY’S TIME.
Therefore, just as God created
and formed man NOT in several days, but “in the DAY [yowm – singular number] that God created [bara’]
man” (Gen 5:1), Genesis 2:4 must be telling us that after God
created the heavens and earth out of nothing in ONE DAY’S TIME, which He called
the BEGINNING of time! This can only mean that Genesis 1:2 is a destruction of
the EARTH and the ATMOSPHERIC HEAVEN and not a creation of them. It also means
that God must have destroyed them at least once.
An Exegesis of Jeremiah’s Prophecy of the
Destruction of the Earth in Genesis 1:2: Contextual Background:
According to the Bible, the great weeping prophet Jeremiah saw a vision of the
preexisting earth before God destroyed it. He saw this vision while he was
prophesying of God’s wrath that was going to be poured out on the land of
Israel. Jeremiah told the people of Israel that God was going to removed them
from their land, and make it desolate and empty of life, if they did not repent
of their sins. As the prophet was preaching this message to them, God gave him a
vision of the preexisting earth. Jeremiah describes this vision this way.
“I beheld the earth and indeed it was [became] without form [tohuw - desolate], and void [i.e. empty];
and the HEAVENS, they had NO LIGHT. I beheld the MOUNTAINS, and indeed they TREMBLED
[i.e. QUAKED], and all the HILLS MOVED BACK
and FORTH. I beheld and indeed there was NO MAN [i.e. on the earth], and all the birds [`owph – flying creatures] of the heavens had fled. I beheld, and indeed the fruitful
land [Karmel - Carmel mountain range] was a
wilderness, and all ITS CITIES were broken down at the presence of the LORD, by
His fierce anger” (Jer 4:23-26).
Sir Lancelot C. Brenton’s
English translation of the Greek Septuagint translated verse 26 this way: “I saw, and, behold, Carmel [i.e.
the mountain range of Carmel] was desert, and all
the cities were burnt with FIRE at the presence of the Lord, and
at the presence of his fierce anger they were utterly destroyed”
(Jer 4:23-26).
Hebrew Lexical
Definition: The TWOT defines the noun Karmel as: (karmel) 1: plantation, garden-land, garden-growth, fruit,
orchard…. (Karmel) 2: …The CARMEL [mountain] RANGE is prominent and famous. It
forms today the harbor of Haifa, which, however, was blocked by marshes
in former times. The southern boundary of the fertile valley of Esdraelon,
it stretches back about thirteen miles to the southeast attaining a height of
1742 feet. Megiddo [was] situated by a pass through the range (#1041
& 1042). This definitely implies that the Carmel mountain range, and no doubt
the entire earth, was FULL of VEGETATION at that time, that is, before God
destroyed the earth and it became a wilderness.
The TWOT defined the Hebrew word
`owph as: fly, fly about, fly away…
flying creatures…. [It] is attributed
to BIRDS… [and] is also used of ANGELIC BEINGS. The seraphim of Isaiah 6 are
six-winged [creatures] with two wings they cover their face, with two wings
they cover their nakedness, and with two wings they FLY (Isa 6:2, 6) (#1582). If `owph refers to BIRDS, this
would mean that ANIMAL LIFE existed in Lucifer’s day. If it refers to ANGELIC
BEINGS, this could only mean Lucifer and his angels.
According to the Bible angels do
fly and they do not need a rocket ship to go from heaven to earth. Daniel
revealed this truth when he said: “while I was speaking in prayer, the man Gabriel, whom I
had seen in the vision at the beginning, being caused to FLY swiftly, reached
me about the time of the evening offering” (Dan 9:21).
There is a third possibility,
which is probably the TRUE INTERPRETATION, it refers to BOTH animal life and
angelic life! There is abundant scientific evidence that the Cambrian through
the Permian strata
of the earth contained a multitude of animal and plant life. There is also
abundant evidence that human beings did not exist at that time. Paleontologist,
archaeologist, and geologist have never discovered any human fossils in those
layers of the earth.
Therefore, according to the
prophet Jeremiah, the original earth suffered a great CATACLYSM; that is, a CATASTROPHIC
event or events that were so devastating that the prehistorical preexisting
earth became a waste land, and also was in a state of total darkness. Since the
earth became a waste place and empty of life, we need to ascertain what
happened to God’s perfect and beautiful original creation?
Biblical Evidence for
the Earth Being Destroyed and Restored: Some theologians believe that Jeremiah’s prophecy
was referring to a future and not a past age. My instructor in Bible College
interpreted this passage this way. I told him: “If this is a future destruction
of the earth, then the passage in Genesis, which context, grammar, and words
are exactly the same, must have been a past destruction, for the language is
the same.”
I reminded him that God will destroy
the earth again, as He did in Lucifer’s day, but this time by fire. I supported
this belief with the following scriptures: The apostle John speaking of the middle
of the future 7 year Tribulation Period, that is, the end of the 1st
three and half years this way: “The stars [meteorites] of the sky fell onto the earth like figs dropping
from a fig tree when a high wind shakes it; The sky was ROLLED
UP like a scroll, and all of the mountains and islands were MOVED
from their places. Then everyone-- the kings of the earth, the rulers,
the generals, the wealthy, the powerful, and every slave and free person-- all
hid themselves in the caves and among the rocks of the mountains. And they
cried to the mountains and the rocks, ‘Fall on us and hide us from the face of
the ONE who sits on the throne and from the WRATH of the Lamb. For the great
day of their [autos singular - His] wrath
has come, and who is able to survive’ ” (Rev
6:13-17, the New Living Translation; cp with Isa 2:10-22).
In other words: “the earth will MOVE OUT of
her PLACE [orbit], in the wrath
of the LORD of hosts and in the day of His fierce anger” (Isa 13:13). When the earth moves out of its orbit toward the
sun, this will cause the sky to appear as though it was been rolled together.
The prophet Isaiah described the very END of the Tribulation Period and
destruction of the earth this way: “Behold,
the LORD lays the earth WASTE, devastates it, DISTORT its surface,
and scatters its inhabitants…. The earth will be completely laid
WAST and completely despoiled, for the LORD has spoken this word….
Therefore, the inhabitants of the earth are burned, and FEW MEN
are LEFT” (Isa 24:1-6, NAS).
This event is definitely in the
future, and the earth is definitely going to become empty of life and a waste
land again, just as it did in Genesis 1:2. The apostle Peter described this
event this way: “But
the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night, in which the heavens [i.e. the
atmospheric heavens] will pass away with a great
noise, and the elements will melt with fervent heat; both the earth and the
works that are in it will be burned up. Therefore, since all these
things will be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy
conduct and godliness, looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God,
because of which the heavens [i.e. the atmospheric heavens] will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will
melt with fervent heat? Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new
heavens [i.e. the atmospheric heavens]
and a new earth in which righteousness dwells” (2Pe 3:10-13).
The earth will never be destroyed to such an extent that it will cease to
exist, for King Solomon said: “A
generation goes and a generation comes, but the earth remains FOREVER
[`owlam]” (Ecc 1:4, NAS). Even though God will change
the surface or crust of the earth, at the above time, by a multitude of massive
volcanic eruptions, which will even set the atmospheric heavens on fire, as He
did in Genesis 1:2, He will never destroy it to the degree where it will exist
no more.
Isaiah prophesying of the
restoration work, which God will perform on our present atmospheric heavens and
earth, after they are destroyed declared: “For
as the new heavens and the new earth, which I will make shall remain before
Me,’ says the LORD, ‘So shall your DESCENDANTS and your NAME remain” (Isa 66:22; also 65:17). The apostle John said it this
way: “I saw a new heaven [i.e.
the atmospheric heaven] and a new earth, for the old
[protos] heaven [i.e. the atmospheric
heaven] and the old [protos] earth had passed away, and the sea was no longer there” (Rev 21:1, Complete Jewish Bible).
Greek Lexical
Definition: Drs. Timothy and Barbara Friberg in their Analytical Lexicon
to the Greek New Testament defined the Greek adjective protos
or old as: first of several; (1) of time; (a) in comparison
of past and present earlier, first, FORMER - RV 2.5 (#23711).
Summary: Therefore, I
believe Jeremiah was describing the destruction of the original atmospheric
heavens and earth [Gen 1:2], and the prophets Isaiah and Peter are describing a future destruction in
our present day. The prophets Isaiah and John are evidently describing a
restoration of the atmospheric heavens and earth that God will perform in the
future, just as He did in Genesis 1:3-25. There will NOT be any need for God to
create man over again for there will be a few human being that will survive
during that time; for Isaiah the prophet said in the
above scriptures: “FEW MEN are LEFT,” and
some men’s: “DESCENDANTS” and “NAME” will “REMAIN.”
This truth can also be seen in Matthew 25:31-46: “When
the Son of Man [the Lord Jesus Christ] COMES
in His glory, and all the holy angels with Him, then He
will sit on the THRONE of His glory. ALL the NATIONS [meaning
survives from the nations] will be gathered before
Him, and He will separate them one from another, as a shepherd divides his sheep
from the goats…. And He will set the sheep on His right hand, but the goats on
the left. Then the King will say to those on His right hand, ‘Come, you blessed
of My Father, inherit the KINGDOM [i.e. Christ’s earthly millennial
kingdom] prepared for you from the foundation
of the world…. Then He will also say to those on the left hand, ‘Depart
from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his
angels.”
Lucifer’s
Rule over the Original Earth
The above passage in Jeremiah
definitely and indisputable declares there “was no man” on earth at that time (Jer 4:25). In other words, there were NO HUMAN BEINGS in
existence on the prehistorical preexisting earth, for the first man Adam was
not created in the time of the original earth. Someone might ask, if mankind
did not exist in the original earth, who built the cities that Jeremiah spoke
of? Good question!
I believe Lucifer and his angels
built these cities. I do not know what their body is composed of, but I do know
it is TANGIBLE, for the Word of God declares: “The ANGELS urged Lot to
hurry…. And while he lingered, the MEN TOOK HOLD of his hand, his wife’s
hand, and the hands of his two daughters, the LORD being merciful
to him, and THEY brought him out and set him outside the city” (Gen 19:15-16). Now since angels can physically grab someone, they
certainly can build cities.
The prophetic Word of God
declares that angels can physically fight against other angels: “And war broke out in
heaven: Michael and his ANGELS fought with the dragon [Lucifer]; and the dragon and his ANGELS fought, but they
did NOT prevail, nor was a place found for them in heaven any longer. So the
great dragon was CAST OUT, that serpent of old, called the Devil
and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was CAST to the earth, and
his ANGELS were CAST OUT with him” (Rev 12:7-9). I
definitely do not believe this was a war of words, but a physical confrontation.
Jesus
speaking of His angels said: “So it will
be at the end of the age. The ANGELS will come forth, separate the wicked from
among the just, and CAST [ballo – throw with force] them into the furnace of fire. There will
be wailing and gnashing of teeth” (Mt 13:49-50; also Isa 37:36; Dan
6:22). If the angels of God do not have some type of physical
tangible body, how can they violently throw tangible lost men into the fire?
In
other words, physical tangible lost human beings will be fighting with God’s
mighty angels, when the Lord Jesus Christ returns to the earth at the end of
the Great Tribulation Period, that is, just before His millennial reign begins.
Therefore, since angels can physically fight with each other and with men, they
certainly can build cities.
I believe animal and plant life
was destroyed as God was in the process of destroying the entire earth, and
Lucifer and his angels FLEW AWAY from the cities they built. In fact, I believe
God was giving us the location of the Garden of Eden or Mountain of God. The
CAPITOL of Lucifer’s empire, where his THRONE was located, was probably the
island City of Tyre, which was not far from the mountains of Carmel that began
at the Mediterranean seaport of Haifa.
I believe that some or many of
the buildings Lucifer’s angels built were probably designed in a pyramid
fashion, for the pyramid has always been an occult symbol by which Lucifer’s
children worshipped him. It is no coincidence that pyramids are found on every
continent, along with cities and temples pyramids. They are even found under
the oceans of the world; for example the group of pyramids found in the area of
the Bermuda Triangle.
In 1977, a 650-FOOT PYRAMID, which was mysteriously
LIT up with sparkling white water surrounding it that turned deep green, was
found on FLOOR of the ATLANTIC OCEAN between South Bimini Island and the north
end of the Cay Sal Bank. If this article is true, than this pyramid would be
about 200 feet higher than the Great Pyramid of Cheop in Egypt, which is
the OLDEST of the Seven Wonders of the World. The AREA in which this pyramid, and other pyramids,
and even under ocean temples were discovered, according to geologists has been
underwater for about 12,000 years. The discovery was photographed by Ari Marahall’s
expedition, and was in the New York Times on May 21, 1978.
NEWSWEEK speaking
of the mystery of the Bermuda Triangle reported: The legend of the Bermuda Triangle-an area defined by imaginary lines
between Bermuda, Puerto Rico and Melbourne on the Florida coast, where more
than 100 SHIPS and PLANES have allegedly VANISHED…. A group of deep-sea explorers recently discovered the
wreckage of five Avengers about 10 miles off the coast of Ft. Lauderdale, which
may very well be the Lost Patrol. Flight 19 is the only group of five Avengers
ever reported missing (http://www.newsweek.com/id/122220; 3/12/2000; The Mystery Of The Lost Patrol, Tom Post; for a complete list of missing planes and
ships: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bermuda_Triangle_incidents;
&
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bermuda_Triangle).
Wikipedia encyclopedia speaking of the Pacific
Bermuda Triangle stated: The Devil’s Sea or
The Pacific Bermuda Triangle is a region of the Pacific around Miyake Island,
about 100 km south of Tokyo. One of the triangle’s corners is said to be on the
island of Guam…. In the United States the Devil’s Sea is widely believed to be,
together with the Bermuda Triangle, an area where ships and planes are said to
disappear under mysterious circumstances…. Among the phenomena reported
in the Devil’s Sea are the loss of ships and planes (MORE than the Bermuda
Triangle) (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Devil%27s_Sea).
National Geographic in an article entitled, ‘City’ of Ancient Rock Found
at Bottom of Atlantic Ocean, reported: Researchers probing the
ocean bottom have found 18-story-high towers of stone deep in the ocean near a
section of volcanic fault ridges that extend for 6,200 miles along the Atlantic
Ocean floor. The MAJESTIC HEIGHT of the TWO DOZEN STONE STRUCTURES… [that were
found] on a seafloor mountain named Atlantis Massif…. Deborah Kelley, an
oceanographer at the University of Washington…was one of three people who
traveled to the newly discovered underworld in a submersible vessel….
Jeff Karson, an oceanographer who explored the area with Kelley, said:
‘If this were on land, this would be a national park.’ The LOST CITY is also
STRIKINGLY BRIGHT—brighter than the usual conditions in which things can
generally be seen using artificial light a half-mile below sea level.
Although other rock formations around volcanic ridges have appeared black,
the newly discovered formations are GLEAMING WHITE…. Kelley, the lead author of
a report on the formations in the July 12 issue of Nature, said the steep-sided
towers of rock blossom into feathery ledges of precipitated stone that
sprawl outwards for as WIDTH as 30 FEET. ‘Most unusual about the structures
are their SIZE. The highest stone spiral reaches 180 FEET above
the ocean floor (http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2001/07/0712_wiredeepseacity.html;
Nature, 7/12001, Lost City of Atlantis vents its
secrets).